Russell M Johnston
Well-known member
So to get to the point I have been looking at alot of lens these last few weeks for something that will fit in my backpack so I can hike and travel easy. I fully understand some jobs will need to have the bigger 500mm and 600mm prime lens and when that time comes I can rent them no problem. Right now I have the Nikon 50-300 ED AIS version of the lens, and I dont know what it is or why but I really love the image off that lens. Very sharp and such a great zoom range with smooth focus pulls and packs into a bag really well. My problem comes from that i want more reach but dont want to get much bigger. I have thought about getting a 1.4x for the lens and seeing what it does to the image, so if anyone would know I would love to hear what you have to say, I have tired a 2x on it and didnt like it that much ( It was an older 2x though)
One of the things I have been thinking about doing as well is sending the lens into RPLens and having a Canon hard mount placed on the lens and then buying a Canon 1.4, but after looking it wont work since the Nikon's back element sits flush with the mount and the Canon 1.4 needs to go inside the lens to fit. I have seen that the Kenko has a 1.4 that doesn't have glass that will impact and heard its not to bad.
So after that, my questions really are what would you do? Should I keep the Nikon and get a 1.4 for it? Invest in maybe a Sigma or Tamron 100-400 lens? Heard great things from people how have used both those lens.
* I shoot on the Raven body and do outdoor sports and wildlife shooting, and once again not trying to match a big prime. I will rent those when the jobs calls for it.
One of the things I have been thinking about doing as well is sending the lens into RPLens and having a Canon hard mount placed on the lens and then buying a Canon 1.4, but after looking it wont work since the Nikon's back element sits flush with the mount and the Canon 1.4 needs to go inside the lens to fit. I have seen that the Kenko has a 1.4 that doesn't have glass that will impact and heard its not to bad.
So after that, my questions really are what would you do? Should I keep the Nikon and get a 1.4 for it? Invest in maybe a Sigma or Tamron 100-400 lens? Heard great things from people how have used both those lens.
* I shoot on the Raven body and do outdoor sports and wildlife shooting, and once again not trying to match a big prime. I will rent those when the jobs calls for it.