Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Now I'm waiting to see what Graeme does about increasing dynamic range.
Has anyone else compared build 18 RA 3.72b with build 17 RA 3.6 yet?
Seeing as this is the difference everyone thinks they are seeing here, it's odd that no one seems to have compared them.
Many of us did - have a look through the thread...
Peter
Here is one (same file - identical settings - 3.60 vs 3.72):
Many of us did - have a look through the thread...
Peter
Here is one (same file - identical settings - 3.60 vs 3.72):
![]()
THAT IS AWSOME..... GREAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sanjin, can you post comparisons? Your last shots are nice but they don't showcase what we are discussing here.
Processing poorly (subjective) exposed low-light tungsten RAW footage in RC or RA at 3200,
often produces more noise than processing at 5000K and colour correcting.
This should not be the case.
In my opinion, it's caused the most heart ache for new shooters. Its like you under-expose in post; a sort-of blue channel timing issue.
I'd like to know what is going on in the software here. Blue gain obviously, but could a different approach be used? Are there consequences?
If I was shooting "Barry Lyndon" tomorrow (1500-2200K sources for instance), I think I would develop at 5k and CC.
I don't think this should be the case.
Sanjin, can you post comparisons? Your last shots are nice but they don't showcase what we are discussing here.
Many of us did - have a look through the thread...
Peter
Here is one (same file - identical settings - 3.60 vs 3.72):
![]()