lordtangent
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2007
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
LOG sensors have long been used in machine vision, but until now they were not too practical for video due to the long integration time which caused severe rolling shutter artifacts. The LINLOG technology mentioned in the following link changes all of that:
http://www.photonfocus.com/html/eng/cmos/linlog.php
A digital camera using LINLOG could actually exceed the dynamic range of film. No hard clipping. No "black sun". Just smooth detail all the way in to the highlights and a nice film-like roll-off (AKA shoulder).
The advantage also works out to more efficient use of code space in the RAW files. Basically, they have a log-like compression that saves bits. And since the log compression happens in analog space (before sampling) it requires no extra circuitry outside of the image sensor to achieve.
Comments?
http://www.photonfocus.com/html/eng/cmos/linlog.php
A digital camera using LINLOG could actually exceed the dynamic range of film. No hard clipping. No "black sun". Just smooth detail all the way in to the highlights and a nice film-like roll-off (AKA shoulder).
The advantage also works out to more efficient use of code space in the RAW files. Basically, they have a log-like compression that saves bits. And since the log compression happens in analog space (before sampling) it requires no extra circuitry outside of the image sensor to achieve.
Comments?