No... just the straight R3D graded in resolve.
thanks mark. love what u r doing btw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No... just the straight R3D graded in resolve.
All that latitude or speed doesn't really help much when you have to recreate daylight after the sun has gone down. If you need to create sunlight falling through a big window, you are still going to need a big lamp, it just might be a 6K HMI instead of a 12K HMI. The reasons you use big lights are not necessarily due to the speed of the camera or the latitude, you use them to substitute for big sources in real life, like a big sky or the sun, where a tiny light isn't going to create the same feeling. Sure, if I can rate a camera at 1000 ASA instead of 500 ASA, I can either use a lamp half as bright or I can stop down the lens by one-stop, and that's convenient. But the need for large units to recreate sunlight on a large scale, or light a large area at night (let's say a field in the middle of the country lit for moonlight) doesn't go away just because the speed of the camera has improved or the latitude.
I would say that the decrease in the amount of lighting being used is just as much due to stylistic trends (greater interest in available light photography), and/or budgetary concerns, as is due to technology.
The Epic is fast, and so is the Alexa, and that's great, but let's not exaggerate what another stop of sensitivity gains you in terms of the need for lighting a scene.
My bet is that the truth lies somewhere in the middle... you need to light, but you can light with less with EPIC. EPIC does not solve every problem, it just makes life a bit easier.
Jim