Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

LENS TEST: Zeiss Super Speed (MK3) VS Zeiss ZF SLR's (Shot on RED)

is there anyway of making an slr lens hold focus through a zoom?
shimming? anything

As Evin said there is no way to do it- it is how the lens is designed - it was never a need for and SLR. The only way I can see getting "around" that issue is to pull focus while you zoom - which will get tricky, but that may be a possible solution. (However, if you are going to be doing a lot of that it would be better to just rent cine glass.)
 
Is there anyone who has direct contact or is working with Zeiss ?

Checking out whether they are going to make the 15/2.8 Distagon for Nikon or not...

I believe this one is still made in Germany.




José
 
Ryan and Evin,

I didn't try the Nikon 17-35mm nor the Nikon 80-200mm, but the Nikon 28-70mm hold focus very well through the range though...

What do you think ?

Antoine
 
Just got my new zeiss zf's in the mail today.

28mm 35mm 50mm 85mm
working on finding a good wide prime or zoom that is faster than 3.
also looking for a long range zoom.

these lenses are beautiful.
just did some quick testing and it looks amazing.

they will be going to duclos on monday for a cine mod (gears, declick, 80mm front)
 
Ryan and Evin,

I didn't try the Nikon 17-35mm nor the Nikon 80-200mm, but the Nikon 28-70mm hold focus very well through the range though...

What do you think ?

Antoine

If it works, that is great. :)

I would recommend against relying on a SLR to hold focus through the zoom. Some of them do, and that is great, however they were not designed to and there for not all SLR lenses will hold focus.
 
Best to think of the SLR short zooms as variable primes. But some are indeed very sharp.
 
RED-ZeissTest.jpg

INTRODUCTION
On May 12, 2008 I met up with fellow cinematographer, and RED owner Hunter Richards (www.hunterhampton.com) and we headed over to Lyon Films (www.lyonfilms.com) where we met with directors Devon Lyon and Kevin Curry. Later, we were joined by Owen Stephens, SOC & inventor of the Pampalite (www.pampalite.com) who got in on the action, and showed us his great line up of florescent lights. The purpose of this get together was two fold, first Hunter updated everyone on the developments that had been made on the RED camera as well as demonstrated the workflow and post process of using the RED in a production environment. Secondly, Devon & I used this opportunity to test out two sets of lenses. Both of us wanted to see how big of a difference there actually is in-between a lens designed for cinema use and for SLR use. The RED can mount both PL lenses and Nikon SLR lenses with a simple change of the lens mount. My cinematography has taken me around the world, and being able to use small, lightweight lenses on a camera capable of shooting raw 4K intrigues me. If the SLR lenses are able to perform at the levels needed for the RED, this would enable me to have a smaller profile and a lighter load to carry when traveling. Scheduled to begin production in the first quarter of 2009, the documentary Walking Through Worlds (www.walkingthroughworlds.com) will take director Joel McEwen and I to remote locations in Asia, and being able to use the SLR lenses on the RED may enable us to get the images we need for the production while keeping down the form factor and weight.

For the last two years I have been using a set of Zeiss ZF SLR lenses and various 35mm adapters on projects that have smaller budgets, but still want the cinematic look of film. For the projects that can afford it, I have been renting the cinema lenses. Having used both styles of lenses I have seen the mechanical differences between the two, and now with this opportunity with the RED I had a chance to see how big of a difference, if any, there is in the image quality of each set of lenses.

To highlight the potential differences between the lens sets I settled on the following tests: sharpness, color, breathing, vignetting, and the mechanics. To keep the results consistent I decided to shoot both charts as well as a real world test. Charts are helpful for consistency and measurements, where as the real world test will show you what you actually get. The cinema glass used for this test was a set of Zeiss Superspeed Lenses (MKIII) with a T-stop of 1.3 and the SLR lenses were the Zeiss ZF lenses with a T-stop of 1.4. To keep as many of the variables out of the equation as possible, the footage was all processed through RED Alert using the same settings. See the picture below for the settings used. The only change made to the real world footage was a change to 709 Gamma in the Output LUT.

RedAlertSettings.jpg


All of the still frames have been left unprocessed and have not been graded, while the sample footage has been graded using the same settings in each set of clips in Color. You can download the Color project files, as well as the sample images and footage at my web site, by going to the resource page: www.ryanewalters.com. In the download you will find this review in PDF form as well as the setup notes for the tests which details out the various settings used, and lighting setups. So lets take a look at what the tests yielded. (I should also mention that the RED we were using was having problems with its CF drive, which ended up corrupting some of the files. We checked the files on site in the camera to see that they recorded ok, but there were a couple that although seemed fine in camera, RED Alert was not able to process them. So there are a couple of missing frames. The people at RED ended up overnighting a replacement drive for Hunter, which was great customer service for him, but too late for this test.)

DOWNLOADS: (Right click - Save As Please)
Just the RESULTS PDF (4MB)
Just the SETUP PDF (3MB)
Just the QuickTime Movie (9MB)
ALL PDFs MOVs, & STILLS (102MB)

EDIT: If for some reason these links are not working, please check my blog at my web site: www.ryanewalters.com - I have all of the same information, pictures, and downloads available there.

Not to resuscitate an ancient post, but I stumbled on this and I had to! Ryan I love all your findings here. As a Contax Lens collector, this was all very comforting (as the Contax Zeiss designs are 95% the same as the ZF's). To find out that the SLR lenses were sharper and breathed less than the Super Speeds is amazing news. Do you remember if the Zeiss SLR lenses had any image shift? That all the lenses color matched between them is amazing news too.

My one question to you is regarding cinema-mechanics. What if the lenses in question were the Contax Zeiss, cinemodded at Duclos? The Contax Zeiss lenses, as opposed to the ZF's and ZE's, focus the right way and have a manual aperture. Once declicked, given a focus ring, and a constant 80mm front, these could have all the mechanics you need right? Knowing this now, would this alter any of your opinions regarding still zeiss vs Super Speeds?

Love your thoughts.
 
Wanted to go back to this amazingly informative thread, but all the images/videos are broken links :(
Would be awesome if you could make them work again Ryan...
 
Thank you for the review.
 
Is there anyone who has direct contact or is working with Zeiss ?

Checking out whether they are going to make the 15/2.8 Distagon for Nikon or not...

I believe this one is still made in Germany.




José


Yes they will. Or they are. They are made in Japan. Great lenses. New 135mm f2.0 and 55mm f1.4 will be here soon.
 
Back
Top