[FS: OPTICS] LEICA R DUCLOS ZOOM SET (Late models) • Canon EF • 21mm–200mm coverage!

[Mark M]

*Price reduced twice now. 80-200mm just sold – 01/12/19

LEICA R DUCLOS ZOOM TRIO – CANON EF MOUNT

Matched/pristine late Leica R zooms recently through Duclos for inspection, servicing and some CLA work too.
Gears on focus and zoom, declicked/dampened, 77mm step-ups with 80mm fronts in Leitax Canon EF/EOS mount.
Gorgeous glass with cine-smooth consistent focus action and insanely beautiful Leica colors/character. All ready to shoot.

Red 4–8k vv coverage.

Newly cinevised and serviced by Duclos:

– Declicked/Dampened
– Seamless 32-pitch Focus Gear Installed
– Seamless 32-pitch Zoom Gear Installed
– 77mm Step-Ups
– 80mm Front Caps
– Canon Leitax EF Mounts
– EF Rear Caps

______


1 – LEICA R 21-35mm F3.5–4 ROM #395xxxx – now $2600

1 – LEICA R 35-70mm F4 ROM #383xxxx – SOLD

1 – LEICA R 80-200mm F4 ROM #380xxxx – SOLD

Email to purchase or with questions: mark@mmagna.com
Buy with confidence – quality is guaranteed and many references available.

 

[Andrew Agcaoili]

tempting mark!

 

[Mark M]

RECENTLY REDUCED:

$500 off – Now $6k

PM or email to purchase: mark@mmagna.com

 

[Thomas Balcom]

Mark, how does the 21-35mm fare against the primes in the same range? Looking at some landscape work (still photography as well) is this a better choice over the 35mm 1.4?

 

[Mark M]

Good question Thomas. Not having tested them side-by-side, I'd say the 21-35mm is probably better for landscape work (with its Aspherical correction) than the 35/1.4. Also the 35/1.4 seems to like its subject to be much closer (ie within 20 feet or so). Though I'm almost certain the 28/2.8 v2 will outperform the zoom for landscape work, whereas with the 24/2.8 I'm not so sure... it'd likely be a close call.

Hope this helps some.

 

[Thomas Balcom]

Mark, very helpful, in my case, the 28v2 may be the best bet. By chance, any thoughts on the Leica 28-90mm vario-elmarit-r – performance against the f/4 35-70?

 

[Mark M]

The 28-90 is the better lens optically speaking. However its not par-focal like the 35-70 F4 (which is). In other words if you're zoomed in and set focus, then zoom out the image quickly goes out of focus and vice versa. Therefore I cannot recommend the 28-90 for cineuse unless you know that going into it and plan to use it more like a prime lens.

 

[Mark M]

The 35-70mm has sold but the other 2 are available:

21-35mm F3.5-4 Zoom #395... 2002 – $2800
80-200mm F4 Zoom #380... 1997 – $1750

Or buy as a pair: $4400

For questions and to purchase: mark@mmagna.com

 

[Mark M]

ANOTHER PRICE DROP!

21-35/3.5-4 Zoom #395... 2002 – NOW $2600

80-200/4 Zoom #380... 1997 – NOW $1500

35-70/4 Zoom #383... 1998 – SOLD

EMAIL TO PURCHASE: mark@mmagna.com

 

[Mark M]

80-200 has now sold. But my favorite in this trio, the wide zoom, is still available:

21-35/3.5-4 Zoom #395... 2002 – $2600

Better than most primes and gorgeous Leica colors/rendering style.
To acquire or ask questions: mark@mmagna.com