Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

La la land magic hour question?

Marcus Friedlander

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Messages
1,124
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Location
Los Angeles
Hey everyone,

So I saw La La Land and was totally stumped by how they pulled off one of their scenes. Hopefully someone on reduser can shed some light!

The scene in question is a performance scene between Gosling and Stone in the hills near Griffith observatory during magic hour. The shot is one six-ish minute long take of the two leaving a party, talking, then breaking out into song, then some more taking. However, during the entire sequence, the sun doesn't seem to move an inch, always staying just on the horizon, and the light levels do not change at all.

My first thoughts were that they shot that sequence on a stage or used some digital trickery like a sky replacement or something. But then I read the ASC article, and the DP said that they didn't do anything special for that shot, just shot it a bunch of times at magic hour and picked the one they liked.

So my question is, how did those six minutes feel so consistent? I get that a great colorist would be able to keep luminance levels consistent across the six minutes, but why did it feel like the sun was not changing either? Am I just crazy? Or does the sun really move that imperceptibly slowly during the late-summer/early-fall? (AND MORE IMPORTANTLY WHY DOESNT IT MOVE THAT SLOWLY WHEN I'M TRYING TO SHOOT MAGIC HOUR SHOTS IN LA????) :)
 
It was shot after the sun had set so what you are seeing is the glow along the horizon, which lasted long enough for the take. Yes, probably as it started to fade, the colorist kept it more consistent, but you'll notice in the sequence that the sky is quite hot at one point in one area as they pan/track around but later it is less hot, so it was naturally changing.
 
Thanks for the response!

I was so focused on watching those hotspots while they were in frame I guess I missed their different luminaces when they went back and forth.

I'll watch it again and see if I notice it this time. Thanks!
 
My god, that's insane. I thought for sure there was background replacement going on - but it looked so seemless. They must have rehearsed that scene to absolute death. Bravo.
 
Note that it was all shot on Kodak negative and digitally color-timed at eFilm in Hollywood by Natasha Leonnett.
 
Back
Top