Alexander Ibrahim
Well-known member
Holy cow, that looks like ass. Granted, I think most of it is the abysmal coloring job, but that unwatchable jello rolling shutter doesn't help much either.
It's weird, I watched a couple of their other spots, and they're very nice. I don't understand how they could think that iPhone footage looks good when they're clearly capable of creating quality work. And it baffles me how they'd waste time with a toy when they've got a Red on their hands! Oh well, more work for the rest of us who care more about quality imagery than the latest gadgets.
I don't think that was a bad coloring job, I think it was iPhone's autoexposure creating issues. Also, they needed a bit more light in the shadows.
As to the rest, the very coolest thing about this is that you have an HD camera that you can do helicopter shots with on the cheap using a cheap RC mini copter. I bet the whole thing was well under $1000, "camera" and copter.
Frankly I am jealous of that one thing right there.
Yes rolling shutter and a bunch of other things suck, but HELICOPTER SHOT!
I think with a RED you need something very close to a real helicopter to pull off the same sort of shots. Even a DSLR with a lightweight lens might have exceeded the payload weight of the heli they were using
I wouldn't use that sort of shot for most of my work... but even with all its apparent flaws it works in some cases. For example, it would be perfect if I was trying to show a remote drone in combat. If I shot such a thing on RED or film I'd degrade the look anyway, here its pre-degraded.
I don't know how controllable the helicopter was, but I think if it moved more slowly rolling shutter would have been less distracting, and thus relatively more usable.