- Thread starter
- #101
FocusOptics
REDuser Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 67
Lets get back to the subject the Ruby
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
All zooms have focus shift as they vary their focale length. The best have very little. But all of them have some. You can get it spot on at the long end (front focus) and the wide end (back focus) and at a spot about 1/3 to 1/2 way done the focale length range. The mechanisim that contols focus shift is called the compensator. It is the group of moveable elements behind the variator group which is the one that varys the focale length of the lens. As lens mechanical design, optical formula and glass types have improved over time the focus shift has become less and less. But it does exist.
And it can be measured.
Lets get back to the subject the Ruby
No problem any timeSorry Stuart. Right! Ruby.
I just did a critical back focus test on Ruby and if there is any "zoom curve" it's hidden by the DOF of such a wide lens. I can't detect any significant shift in focus distance at any of the marked focal lengths.
Chuck,Hi Evin,
I was not asking about the Depth of Field which is what I take it you mean by not seeing any shift in focus distance. I was asking about depth of FOCUS shift which is very shallow on a wide angle lens.
Chuck,
There is no focus shift on this lens,
Optically and mechanically Depth of focus does not change on this lens. no image shift
Stuart
Excerpt from a recent Thom Hogan article, I thought this was interesting :
"As my eventual review of the 14-24mm will reveal: it's a 5 out of 5, a 10 out of 10, a 100 out of 100, an n out of n. It doesn't matter what scale you rate it on, it's just a near flawless lens. Too bad about the "no filters" bit. The funny thing is that the 14-24mm Nikkor is a better lens than the Zeiss 18mm or Zeiss 21mm. Yep. A zoom outshoots the high-end primes. Really."
He refers of course to the original, not Ruby.
Rudi,
this lens covers ff35 horizontal is 36mm across.
Stuart
So what lens is up next? I vote for the 24-70!
My guess is around 80 degrees horizontal angle of view with the Ruby 14mm on the Red.
That's somewhat equivalent to an HD wide video lens at 5.4mm for wide or handheld work.
Sorry Stuart (and thanks!) but I meant coverage in degrees, as in 75, 80, 90 degrees, whatever it yields on a S35 sensor. I know that this should be slightly over 110 degrees on a FF35 frame, but I don't know exactly what it is on the smaller S35 frame...