Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Hey Red, thanks for making Angelina Jolie look ugly

Status
Not open for further replies.
Essor said:
Do you even bother to read my posts?

I have already mentioned several times that my inquiry is related to the way the RED was used, it is not a questioning of the quality of the camera itself.
Click to expand...

Dude, there's not a frame of RED footage in that trailer. It's entirely film.

So how can you deduce anything about RED from it must be because you're psychic. While you're here, what are next week's lottery numbers?
 
joelnet said:
Dude, there's not a frame of RED footage in that trailer. It's entirely film.

So how can you deduce anything about RED from it must be because you're psychic. While you're here, what are next week's lottery numbers?
Click to expand...

Or a single frame of RED in the movie itself, I am to understand.

Then I am curious to know what it's doing on the main page of red.com
 
Essor said:
Or a single frame of RED in the movie itself, I am to understand.

Then I am curious to know what it's doing on the main page of red.com
Click to expand...

Probably because they didn't know how RED wasn't going to be used in the final movie until everyone else found out. RED was there, was shot alongside film for a number of scenes and the director and DP thought RED looked great. BUT they shot the entire film on film... so cutting in a few RED scenes just for the sake of doing it wouldn't make much sense. The final cut isn't done. There's a chance RED will save a shot somewhere.
 
You do understand that with it being in the first few images under the "SHOT ON RED" portion of the Red site, it is suggested, even implied that it was literally shot on red.

The problem doesn't lie with me, but with Red's site. They should either remove it or mention exactly how it was 'shot on red'.

There would be no shame in having a secondary category of movies on which Red participated, but were not actually shot with it.
 
Essor said:
You do understand that with it being in the first few images under the "SHOT ON RED" portion of the Red site, it is suggested, even implied that it was literally shot on red.
Click to expand...

I'd agree with that. They've got a great quote saying the DP and director couldn't tell RED from Film. That's all they need. But they didn't have that information until maybe a week ago and they're pretty busy over there with firmware updates and NAB, ya know? Maybe you could cut 'em a little slack this time.
 
I don't have to cut them some slack.

Because I wasn't accusing them of anything in the first place.

YOU, AND YOUR POSSE (not yours, personally, of course) OF LOVABLE RED FANS, accused me of not knowing what the real deal is with the movie.

Yeah, like I'm supposed to read every thread on this forum. No buddy, it's on red.com, and I don't blame them, I don't feel lied to, but you're certainly not going to blame me for it.
 
This thread has no good reason to stay open. Just a bunch o' boys arguing.

Take it somewhere else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top