Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Hd For Indies

I compared them to f900, i honestly thought i was looking at something from a DVX in comparison.
 
"the difference between this and cinealta is like night and day."

Like night and day, huh... what about day for night?
 
What about the HPX500. Toast or not?
HPX500.jpg
 
Lol... First one is very nice, Flame. Shows that the filmlike quality come more from defects that otherwise.

Personally I think most "filmic" grades tend to be more a caricature of film than an actual representation.

It's like double interlacing film and then crushing the highlights. It 'looks like video' but really it's just caricaturing it.
 
Thought I'd have some fun with color correction. By no means are these pro grading... just havin' fun. ;) But so much data to work with! Awesome.

(Original is first - but converted to 1024 jpg)
971_1189064519.jpg


971_1189064615.jpg


971_1189064643.jpg


971_1189064690.jpg

Casey, very nice "three faces of eve". If ever a camera could have dissociative identity disorder... I appreciate your sense of aesthetics and the range of contrast you have been able to modestly demonstrate.

Thanks Andrew, it was fun to try different moods. I love what others have done on this thread as well. Keep it up guys - very cool!
 
Well, adding grain in order to make it more filmic ain't caricaturing, ain't it? It is an inherent characteristic of film.

What I try to say, as Graeme stated before, is that well shot RED footage only gives away its origin because it lacks certain defects characteristic of the photochemical image.

I recently transfered a HDV short film and the 35mm copy was certainly more film-like than the clean HDV digital master. And why was that? Mainly because two charcateristics were added: grain in the transfer and the flickering in the projection.
 
That wasn't very clear. Let me reformulate it.

I mean that almost every good characteristic of film is present in those pics and that if someone didn't find them film-like was just because some of its defects were missing.

Hence the grainy CC I did.
 
"the difference between this and cinealta is like night and day."

Like night and day, huh... what about day for night?

Very nice, Kjetil! (image below) Do you have a higher quality jpeg of this?

"Night and Day... you are the One!" :)
 
One more

One more

Just one more. Can't believe what you can pull out of the tiff's.
B016_C006_070902_001_OCN.jpg
 
car_top.jpg

Shake-GenArts-Sapphire-S_FilmEffect-FilmPrint-Kodak_2383

car_smoke.jpg

Shake-GenArts-Sapphire-S_FilmEffect-FilmPrint-Kodak_2383
 
Very nice, Kjetil! (image below) Do you have a higher quality jpeg of this?

"Night and Day... you are the One!" :)

Sorry, I only worked with a small sized jpg posted directly on this forum.

Another version: Bright and early...
 
Back
Top