Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Graeme's magic...

Sounds fantastic, I like how Red is always striving on making the images better.

I can't wait to compare Red Gamma 3 images on my Scarlets to DSLR RAW stills I shoot with the same glass, for sharpness and grain structure.
I use the ACR developed RAW stills from a Canon body as a guide/benchmark to refer to.
 
This is exactly why Red is the only Digital Cinema camera system I feel comfortable buying. It is the closest thing to future proof camera technology in existence. Love it! :)
 
I had two shots I wanted to use that were completely saved by new colour science. not only saved but incredibly so. cant wait to see what the new colour science does. this is what makes red amazing. almost anything is now achievable on modest budgets now.
 
I was just playing around with some original M sensor footage we shot a couple years ago in REDcine-X and using the new color science and Alchemy wizardry. My jaw was on the floor at how good I could make it look. And now it will get even better again. As Mr. Lovett said, this really is one of the biggest advantages of going with RED. Thanks a million Jim, RED team and Graeme!
 
Thanks Mr. Jannard!

Glad to see you're back!

Can't wait to use Graeme's new creation :)

Good thing it can be used in camera :)


Antoine
 
So the tech crowd can better understand: What is meant by "RED gamma n " ?

If it is in camera, is it modifying the color ( 3d lut? ) as it comes from the sensor, in essence 'baking in' a different color into the otherwise assumed RAW file ?
Or is it just a tag that is added to the meta data to be picked up by post processing ( RCX) and applied there ?

I hope that it is the latter.

Someone point me to a description of the term, as I am new to Red terminology.
 
Les Dittert said:
So the tech crowd can better understand: What is meant by "RED gamma n " ?

If it is in camera, is it modifying the color ( 3d lut? ) as it comes from the sensor, in essence 'baking in' a different color into the otherwise assumed RAW file ?
Or is it just a tag that is added to the meta data to be picked up by post processing ( RCX) and applied there ?

I hope that it is the latter.

Someone point me to a description of the term, as I am new to Red terminology.
Click to expand...

The RED cameras always shoot and record RAW, so nothing that is done with a new REDGamma is permanent - as you say, it's metadata. One of the major benefits of RAW is that you can keep improving things.

Graeme
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top