Got some artifacts probem low framerate stills, is this normal for dragon?

[David Battistella]

I'm running build 36 of RCX. Have not looked at the files through any other software that converts r3d, resolve, fop x, premiere, ect.

Did look at them in FCP X and the hot pixels are there.

 

[Björn Benckert]

I'm running build 36 of RCX. Have not looked at the files through any other software that converts r3d, resolve, fop x, premiere, ect.

Did look at them in FCP X and the hot pixels are there.

It´s consistant. So it´s not a RCXP thing. Here is a screen dump from r3d debayered in flame:

 

[Gunleik Groven]

It´s consistant. So it´s not a RCXP thing. Here is a screen dump from flame:

It would be.

What I am curious of is if it is the "same" pixels, or new pixels showing this performance under different scenarios.
I am inclined to believe the latter.

 

[David Battistella]

It would be.

What I am curious of is if it is the "same" pixels, or new pixels showing this performance under different scenarios.
I am inclined to believe the latter.

Have you done a little test Gunleik?

 

[Gunleik Groven]

Have you done a little test Gunleik?

I'm kinda busy now, but I'll see if I can do it over the week

 

[David Battistella]

I just rolled back to version 5, have not shot the same material, but was out yesterday and when I spot checked everything it looked great.

 

[David Battistella]

Any more on this?

No one contacted me for r3d's .

Should we just file support tickets?

 

[Christoffer Glans]

So what's the news on this? What is going on?

 

[Björn Benckert]

Posdibly there is a reason why the camera only do 1fps and not 0.1fps. But as Greame stated here you can reach far better result by using frame average. To me it seams easy enough for red to do frame average when so fits/creates a better result but on the other hand I find it kind of nice that the canera does just what it told to do and the user have to decide when its better to do record processing or not. As the results might vary with exposure, compression etc so as allways the result and what is the best aproach is very dependant of whats actually shot. But simply put, Avoid 1sec exposures. Better shoot 4fps 360 frame average 2 and speed 200% in post. Normally that stop of light loss compared to normal 1fps 180 deg is really no loss as you get less noise from the frame processing. And normally you can go even higher in framerate and the frame averaging will improve your image so when iso is raised it will look better than singel longer exposure.