Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

FS - Zoom Lens Angenieux HR 25-250 , T=3.5 , mint condition

S

Sergey Kravchenco

Banned
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
707
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
St.Petersburg , Russia
For Sale Zoom Lens Angenieux HR 25-250 , T=3.5 , PL mount . Lens in mint optic and cosmetic condition . Was used one time and after was stored in warehouse .See photos . Iris ring 3.5 - 22 . Close focus 1.7 m .Lens comes with two scales in meters and in feet .Lens has front and rear caps . Lens comes in original flying box .Lens has support for heavy lens .
Lens was tested on Optica Elite :
Visual resolving power
F = 25 mm - 200 /120 lines / mm
F = 250 mm - 110/65 lines /mm

Price has been reduced up to $ 19000 !!!

If you need I can make PL mounted rear anamorphic adapter for it zoom lens for additional $ 1700
Please only serious offers.

If you have any question or additional photos - please contact with me .

sergastr@list.ru

sergastr@yahoo.com

Best regards

Sergey
 
As far as I know, the HR version of the Angie 25-250 was only and always T.3.5.
Cheers,
Harry
 
I believe the HP model's front rotates, eliminating the possibility of a clip-on mattebox.
It's a generation older, so I would assume optically a step down from the HR (which in itself is a step down from an Optimo)
Not sure of any other disadvantages...
Maybe the lens marking is not as detailed as the HR and the Optimo?
Cheers,
Harry
 
Harry Clark said:
I believe the HP model's front rotates, eliminating the possibility of a clip-on mattebox.
Click to expand...

I have one in my possession at the moment. It telescopes in and out, but does not rotate. It does telescope enough though that a bellows can't travel the full length from 6' focus to infinity.

Harry Clark said:
It's a generation older, so I would assume optically a step down from the HR (which in itself is a step down from an Optimo)
Not sure of any other disadvantages...
Maybe the lens marking is not as detailed as the HR and the Optimo?
Click to expand...

Others have said here that the HP is optically the same or very similar, it's the mechanics that got a hefty upgrade in the HR.

In my very casual tests, the HP seems relatively sharp and modern looking. So far I've only seen weakness on the long end wide open (duh), but there might be more I haven't seen.

Seems like a great lens for $6500.
 
Ah, yes. Telescoping, not rotating. My memory of that lens is hazy. Thanks, Nate...
Cheers,
Harry
 
I think Nate meant the HP, not the HR...
Cheers,
Harry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top