Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

FS: Cooke 20-100, T3.1 with 9.5-47.5, T1.5 conversion and mattebox

Markus Rave

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
607
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Website
www.markus-rave.de
SOLD

Selling a rare Cooke Zoom 20-100mm, T3.1 including ARRI 6.6x6.6 mattebox, rod support and a conversion that gives you a 9.5-47.5 lens with an unbelieveable T1.5 for 16mm use. All lenses are free of any damage, no scratches or whatsoever. Coating is free of damage. Clean on the collimator, straight curve.
 

Attachments

  • DSC08003.jpg
    DSC08003.jpg
    56.9 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC08011.jpg
    DSC08011.jpg
    52.3 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC07999.jpg
    DSC07999.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC08008.jpg
    DSC08008.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 0
  • DSC08020.jpg
    DSC08020.jpg
    84.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
... a conversion that gives you a 9.5-47.5 lens with an unbelieveable T1.5 for 16mm use. All lenses ....

What kind of a conversion make the light twice as much? Also what do you mean "All lenses..." this is a one zoom deal, not many lenses.
Please explain.
 
What kind of a conversion make the light twice as much? Also what do you mean "All lenses..." this is a one zoom deal, not many lenses.
Please explain.

Hi David,

Cooke offered this conversion and if you knew about 16mm Cooke lenses, you would know they had a T1.5 zoom 9.5-47.5mm in their range. It weighs as much as the 20-100. Anyway I am not a lens technician to explain why a T3.1 in 35mm comes down to a T1.5 in 16mm. Fact is it does.
In my not very technical understanding it must be the reduced negative area coupled with a much bigger lens diameter as needed for a T3.1 for 16mm use. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can enlighten us.

Of course the zoom has not only one lens but a couple of them inside. Fungus could be anywhere, especially scratches on the front and back element if you find this more clear. My lens has none of these.

Regards
 
What kind of a conversion make the light twice as much?

It's not twice as much light, it is the same amount of light. The conversion is a focal length reducer, the opposite of a teleconverter/extender. When you shrink the image circle, the same quantity of light (minus very minor transmission loss for the extra optics) becomes more concentrated over the a smaller area. The contents of the image circle are exactly the same, only shrunken by 2x (2x less diameter, 4x less area, 4x/2stops "brighter"), to work the same way on 16mm as it did on 35mm, same DOF, etc. 20mm T3.1 for 35mm format will have the same DOF as 9.5mm T1.5 for 16mm format.

20mm / 9.5mm = 2.1 so it is using a 2.1x focal length reducer
T3.1 / 2.1 = T1.5 makes sense
 
A Perfect explanation. I used to own 2 of these lenses for S16mm use on both NPR and Arri SR cameras. They were used for Dramas and Commercials for TV work. The images are stunning when they are set up and supported correctly. An excellent buy IMHO if you need a lens of this type. It should cover 2k 16:9 TV. on the S16mm optics.
Cheers Tonycovell.
 
Back
Top