Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Fisheye Shift Lenses

Mathew Joki

Active member
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I just wondered if anything in the way of Fisheye Shift Lenses even exists.

I realise that the purpose of a shift lens is to "correct" perspect (for architecture photography, etc.) and that the purpose of a wide fisheye lens is to distort perspect, which would make sense that they aren't usually combined into a single lens... But what I'm interested in is the embellishment that shifting would have on the curved distortion caused by a fisheye.

Any thoughts on this? Does anyone know of examples where this has been used or experimented with? Or if any such lenses do exist?

Cheers!
 
Coverage is going to be your issue. Most fisheye lenses, being very wide, have a small image circle, for example the Nikon 8mm fisheye, one of the best has an image circle of just under 24mm. The 16mm Nikon has a larger image circle, larger than 36mm. I would talk to Matt Duclos about doing something. He is a great lens guy.
 
Yeah that was another thing that I thought about as well... Would likely have to be a pretty massive/complex piece of glass for all the properties to work properly together.
 
Richard: You're saying that since a normal tilt/shift has a much larger image circle than the sensor area, by making the lens wider - thereby shrinking the image circle - you'd be concerned with cropping at the extremes of the tilt or shift functions?

In any regard, it's an interesting question you ask. If you ever do find a fish-eye tilt/shift, please post some samples, I'd be very curious to see them.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what the originals look like. The author of that blog said he had to stitch the images together.....

He's a better link:
http://kaleidoscopy.com/?p=264
These pics might not be stitched together. The author mentions that for a cheaper alternative, you can buy a lens that will cover just a FF sensor, BUT that's where you have to do some stitching. It says that he used a Mamiya 24mm fish-eye 645 format lens with a tilt/shift adapter. Even with the larger image circle from the lens, he still couldn't do a full tilt or shift.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top