Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

EOS "dumb" mount Update.

The 10-22 is going to be one of people's faves once they start using EF and EF-S glass on their Reds.
 
2x extender should work fine, I have not tried one yet, but will do. the 100-400 IS with 2x would be pretty nice to see! Also going to try to do some "wider" aperature shots outside, didn't have any ND's on hand so had to stop down severely. I have to say been super happy with the way my canon glass has performed, (look wise), now it's obvious the limitations when it comes to things like pulling foucus, exposure ect... but where there are problems there are solutions coming... :whistling:
 
My pore 100-400? I would actually pay to see it with the 1200mm - did You know that Jim is one of the few lucky owners? Actually on the Red One this lens would be the equivalent of 1920mm (if I am not mistaken), so with the 2x it will be 3840mm... You could really check the Martian's chicks on their nude beaches... :) ...but seriously - could You imagine a moon closeup with this combo?!?!?

Few of these lenses exist; Sports Illustrated magazine owns two of them, as does Canon Professional Services and James Jannard, the billionaire founder of Oakley.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top