- Moderator
- #21
Jeff Kilgroe
Well-known member
The most negative aspect of the electronic rolling shutter of RED's CMOS choice IMHO is not the jello effect which RED seems to control very well, but the issue with strobe and short duration lighting. How will Scarlet and other RED cameras deal with that?
But film has the exact same issue with strobes or other short-duration light or images. Muzzle flashes on firearms a good example too. If a strobe or a muzzle flash goes off after a mechanical shutter has begun to wipe across the film plane, we see a partially-exposed flash or strobe.
The only real difference is that with film, the edge of where the exposed light ends in frame is a lot softer due to the edge of the mirror shutter being defocused. The edge of the shutter also wipes across the film plane at an angle instead of perfectly horizontal as it does on the RED CMOS.
Ultimately, I think the best real-world solution would be an adjustable rolling shutter that could be dialed from 0 (or the equivalent of a global shutter) up to some value that induces the desired amount of skew. To take it one step further, what if instead of a horizontal scan-line reset pattern, the user could define a reset pattern mask, to control how the electronic shutter behaves. We could achieve skew that is nearly identical to that of a mechanical shutter camera if the reset can be made to roll across the sensor plane on a 45 degree angle or such. ...I've suggested this before, but I don't think the technology is here yet.
That said, I'm glad RED has chosen the rolling shutter path. In most situations it helps give the camera's image a nice organic feel and more film-like motion that we just don't get from a CCD or global shutter imager. It will be nice when the reset times can be made faster though. Supposedly, Mysterium-X is about 40% faster. That was a number that was thrown out a few months back.