I also found this interesting side by side comparison on the 100-300 where it optically beats out the latest Sony GM 100-400mm zoom : http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1501962/3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So I recently went to Japan (Osaka specifically) and went on kind of a giant Contax shopping spree. I found a tiny yet amazing store (forget the name) filled with Contax lenses at awesome prices and just couldn't help myself haha. I have a set of the "Supers" but don't have any of the "Standards" or zooms so that's what I went about buying for my collection. There was also the added advantage that I could inspect all of the lenses firsthand which you can't do off ebay.
Here's the haul:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Listed out:
Contax Zeiss Distagon T* 25mm f/2.8 AE
Contax Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.8 MM
Contax Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/2.8 AE
Contax Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.7 MM
Contax Zeiss Sonnar T* 85mm f/2.8 AE
Contax Zeiss Sonnar T* 100mm f/3.5 MM
Zooms (all MM):
Contax Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* 35-70mm f/3.4
Contax Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* 28-85mm f/3.3-4.0
Contax Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* 80-200mm f/4
Contax Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* 100-300 f/4.5-5.6
Was especially pleased with my 100-300mm as it's a later 8400635 serial number.
![]()
With the help of my tour guide, I managed to bargain down and purchase all 10 of these lenses and a Contax RTS film camera (just to play around with) for around $3000 which is a lot cheaper than what I've found on eBay. Can't wait to test them out!
Heya Craig I have some AEs for sale, hit me up if you still need some FL, ok?
BTW MM have more contrast for sure so in some instances AEs are better indeed!
And some AEs seem to have a tiny more microcontrast VS the same FL in MM.
Does the 60 and 100 only come in AE?
So, I just recently bought a set of Contax Zeiss for pretty cheap:
28mm f2.8 MM
35mm f2.8 MM
50mm f1.4 MM (also I previously had a 50mm f1.4 ZE)
85mm f1.4 MM
And used a couple of them on a shoot last weekend. I've always loved my 50mm ZE but oh my goodness, I totally fell in love with the images that the 28mm and the 85mm provided. I totally see where people talk about the renowned Zeiss 3D rendering. The shots were just utterly beautiful - flattering to skin (especially the 85mm), and the falloff into the out of focus areas... there was a shot with the 28mm with a girl about 3 feet in front of me, on the street. She had this "pop" and clarity within the frame, while the buildings in the background had this lovely blur to it, even at f4. And the colours. Oh, the colours!
They were a huuuuge upgrade from my Canon 16-35L and 24-105L lenses. And I didn't spend more than $2k in total. I'm just starting out as a DP, but the new lenses just took the images taken with my Epic-W to a whole new level - it had such a "cinematic" feel to it. I think I also now understand what people mean by taking the digital "edge" off. The images were so "creamy" haha. Gosh, and these are "lower-end" lenses too, I can't even begin to imagine how much better the Super Speeds and Cookes and Angénieux lenses would look.
Oh, and my next ones on the list to get when I have enough money haha:
21mm f2.8
28mm f2 Hollywood
35mm f1.4
135mm f2
And one of the macro lenses
Ok time to declick and get the Leitax mount!
Thanks Nick for your guide, it was such a great help in which lenses to get. Epic-W and Contax Zeiss - what an awesome pairing.
Watch out! You'll get the bug.)
@Homer
I wouldn't go for the 135mm f2. It#s hard to find, expensive and not really great WO. The 135mm f2.8 is good from the start and far cheaper.
All the others you consider are great, but good luck with the 21mm…
Just picked up the 80-200 in Mint condition for $200. I have a specific use for it coming up. So still missing the 100, 135, 180 and the 35-70 but getting there.