Comming soon...

[PaulClements]

4K soft porn? I reckon you might've trumped GibCor's 3D shoot

 

[Roberto B]

evin, we're waiting for that soft sharpness.. the rest depends on your fantasy..

here's mine.. a red with the best premium accessory pack..

 

[J. Bernard Vallon]

Actors and actress are not going to like footage projected 4k-unless there is major "video photoshoping."

Matthew

i'm going to go into business providing a full service mobile waxing and airbrush station for actresses being shot on 4k. Show up, cover her in wax from the eyebrows down, pull. spray her bronzey/skintone, collect my check. It'll be awesome.

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

Shake 4.1 >> FilmStock Kodak Eastman 5245

 

[Fix]

lol Man! thats like 8mm

 

[jaadgy akanni]

lol Man! thats like 8mm

that's what came to my mind too-super 8

 

[Justin Kirchhoff]

take the intensity of the grain down, lol.

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

Shake 4.1 post:

- TrueLight Color>>Profile-Kodak Color Vision Primer>>Display>>Digital Projector>>ColourSpace>>Lin

- GenArts Sapphire Filter>>FilmEffects>>NegFilm>>Kodak 5245>>Film Print>>Kodak Print 5386

- Film grain Filter>>You could adjust the grain size for example from 1 to 0.5.

 

[Andrew Benz]

Nice, subtle rack (focus) to bring the bra buckle in focus...

 

[Jaime Vallés]

Wish you were here.

Damn, man! That's an awesome shot! Subtle, yet full of meaning. The movie looks great too. Nothing sexier than a woman putting her clothes back on... :blush:

 

[Thor Wixom]

Seeing these two images together reminds me how much I dislike grain.

I know that many of you totally disagree. You're entitled to your opinions.

Footage from CTL was crisp, the way my eye would see it if I were really there.

My eye doesn't see in grain, not even in extrememly low light. My brain processes the images differently than film does, and in a more similar fashion to the way the Red One "sees".

I'll take razor sharp digital images over grainy film images every time.

-Thor

 

[Joel Kaye]

Seeing these two images together reminds me how much I dislike grain.

Yeah - it looks like Flashdance gone horribly wrong. There's no grain in a oil painting... I remain unconvinced grain is required.

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

What do you prefer?

You said do not like a "film look"!?

Why?

But this "crispy" picture has a bad side of video look that has optically lower black levels while raises highlights and should be the opposite like a real film look that optically raises black levels while lowering highlights.

Even Ted at IBC presentation said that RED still did not reach a film quality but they working to achieve that one day in the future.

 

[Matt Garrett]

I'm looking forward to seeing more of this.

 

[Michel Hafner]

Even Ted at IBC presentation said that RED still did not reach a film quality but they working to achieve that one day in the future.

He was talking about dynamic range/latitude, not the overall image quality. Latitude isn't everything.

 

[Álex Montoya]

Does the title of the thread "comming soon" mean what I think?

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

He was talking about dynamic range/latitude, not the overall image quality. Latitude isn't everything.

What does it mean for you "the overall image quality" in digital or film acquisition?

 

[Álex Montoya]

Well, definition and lack of grain are clearly fields in which the RED ONE is superior.

 

[Álex Montoya]

Anyway, I would like to get a tiff or a high quality 4K JPG of this frame wo play with it a bit

 

[Joel Kaye]

You said do not like a "film look"!?

Why?

This shot posted has already been graded already. I just don't think added noise helps.

Why?

Same reason I like girls with pink hair I guess. Everybody gets a different feeling when they look at the same thing. Maybe I'd feel differently if the pictures were in motion and I was viewing in a theater and not through a web browser.

I might like a different grade on this shot better - but it's clear to me a very pleasing result can be created from this footage. So I'm happy. :clown2: