Can the news about HFR exploration be part of digital marketing strategy as well?

[Melih Engin Eskier]

I knew that early films were projected at various speeds and 24fps, 25fps and 29.98fps were settled all this time as the most suitable frame rates for the human eye perception of film. However the facts in RED 101 were enlightning;

...a frame rate all the way up to 60-80 fps makes footage appear more lifelike by enhancing clarity and smoothness. This raises the question of juddering and smoothness.

I'm asking both because I have a problem viewing the 24, 60 fps videos online at the website and I get the sense in spite of all its history film is suddenly being treated so underrated by digital world all of a sudden.

What would you have to argue about the term "hyper-real?" I think human eye will learn to adopt the new technology (if it settles) in a short time.

And finally according to the article, again this distinction between CDs and VINYLs are real. However CDs overrule the music market.

I'd be amazed to hear what you, the beholders of better and much more information have to say about this.

 

[Marc Wielage]

No, early silent films were projected anywhere from 16fps to 20fps. 24fps came as a requirement for the sound era, right around 1927-1928.

Many believe that the human eye sees somewhere around 60fps, so variations around this frame rate seem to be more "real" than other speeds. (30fps has a similar effect, but not as vivid.)

Read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Showscan