Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

building a post computer..

Zakaree Sandberg

Zakaree Sandberg

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,260
Reaction score
1
Points
38
Age
43
Location
Los Angeles, CA
looking to build a PC (figured i can get more for less)
mostly for finishing (coloring and whatnot)

please give me a list of what i should get...

video card,
processor,
ram,
monitor (color correct.. yet on a budget),
so on...

thank you!
 
Hi Zakaree,

I did well with a system like this:

$229 Intel i7 Chip
$350 Gigabyte X58 UD5 Motherboard
$329 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OC 896MB GDDR3 PCIe 2.0 Graphic Card
$141 Corsair Memory XMS3 6GB DDR3-1600 (PC-12800) CL9 DIMM Memory Kit (Three 2GB Memory Modules), get two kits (12Gig) if you can
$170 PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750 Quad Black Power Supply or similar
$119 Antec Performance One P182 ATX Tower or Similar
$70 Thermaltake 6 Heatpipe CPU cooler for Intel Core i7 or similar
$200 SATA Hard Drives

$1500 will get you a kick-ass machine capable of easy overclocking.

Check out the thread http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23932&highlight=mother+board
 
hi kidrobot, cool! i really like the gigabyte board, i've been using the beta windows 7, great improvement over vista, have you been overclocking your chip?
 
No, not yet. I haven't really been getting on with Vista until recently. I got it looking like XP, but I still hate the way the file explorer looks, feels and behaves.
 
Get a 64-bit i7 system with a shitload of fast DD3 RAM. A lot of the video programs can use multiple cores now but each core requires like 3GBs of RAM independently. So you need at least 12- or 14GBs of RAM to fully take advantage.
 
Tom said:
Get a 64-bit i7 system with a shitload of fast DD3 RAM. A lot of the video programs can use multiple cores now but each core requires like 3GBs of RAM independently. So you need at least 12- or 14GBs of RAM to fully take advantage.
Click to expand...

dont forget MS OS limitations on memory... a PC aint a MAC... 3 GB max on XP and I think 4GB max on Vista... the rest is a waste of $... as its not
being optimized by OS...

Again, this is not MAC OS... which optimizes cores and memory.

Unless you run 64 bit OS (server 2003), but then you lose legacy support on 32Gb apps.

I hear Longhorn may be ready in 2025 though :shiftyph34r:
 
I think 64-bit Vista can handle at least 16GB, maybe more.
 
Tim Whitcomb said:
dont forget MS OS limitations on memory... a PC aint a MAC... 3 GB max on XP and I think 4GB max on Vista... the rest is a waste of $... as its not
being optimized by OS...
Click to expand...

Beg to differ, it does make a difference and you can see it on applications that are multi-threaded. I just bough a Gateway FX workstation with am i-7 processor, 64 bit Vista and the rest of the niceties, and tagged 12 gigs iof Corsair dominator trichannel DDR3 ram on it, then overcloked the system to run at 3.2G and got it all for $1900. that system flies!!! Rendering HDCAM footage on it, say, a 50 minute timeline with 3-4 layers of effects, etc, gets done in 22 minutes! all 4 cores running at close to 100% and the RAM usage pegged at 70% of the total of 12 gigs. This beats the same rendering done of the same material on an octo core Mac with 16 Gigs of RAM by about 6 minutes. Anyway, not meaning to start the old Mac-PC debate here, but for about $2000, that system is amazingly fast, stable, quiet and runs super cool. A true bargain really. Truth is, building it yourself does not make it cheaper anymore when compared to some manufacturers, although it is potentially a bit of fun if you like to tinker with parts. But I highly recommend these Gateway FX workstations as a good, cheap and reliable foundation to build upon. We have now 3 of them and have no complaints whatsoever.
 
Rudi Herbert said:
got it all for $1900. that system flies!!! Rendering HDCAM footage on it, say, a 50 minute timeline with 3-4 layers of effects, etc, gets done in 22 minutes!
Click to expand...

Anyone else sold? That's kinda what I was looking at building when I save up enough green. The i7s are a good deal; however shouldn't we be spending the most on our processor, and less on the Mobo?

EDIT: just looked at the core i7 mobos and realized how expensive they are. Guess have to make do.
 
Rudi Herbert said:
... Rendering HDCAM footage on it, say, a 50 minute timeline with 3-4 layers of effects, etc, gets done in 22 minutes! all 4 cores running at close to 100% and the RAM usage pegged at 70% of the total of 12 gigs....
Click to expand...

The Windows Task Manager on your i7 should show 8 cores - not 4.

You might want to check your BIOS and check to see if "Hyperthreading" is enabled.

Cheers,

Adam
 
Rudi Herbert said:
Beg to differ, it does make a difference and you can see it on applications that are multi-threaded. I just bough a Gateway FX workstation with am i-7 processor, 64 bit Vista and the rest of the niceties, and tagged 12 gigs iof Corsair dominator trichannel DDR3 ram on it, then overcloked the system to run at 3.2G and got it all for $1900. that system flies!!! Rendering HDCAM footage on it, say, a 50 minute timeline with 3-4 layers of effects, etc, gets done in 22 minutes! all 4 cores running at close to 100% and the RAM usage pegged at 70% of the total of 12 gigs. This beats the same rendering done of the same material on an octo core Mac with 16 Gigs of RAM by about 6 minutes. Anyway, not meaning to start the old Mac-PC debate here, but for about $2000, that system is amazingly fast, stable, quiet and runs super cool. A true bargain really. Truth is, building it yourself does not make it cheaper anymore when compared to some manufacturers, although it is potentially a bit of fun if you like to tinker with parts. But I highly recommend these Gateway FX workstations as a good, cheap and reliable foundation to build upon. We have now 3 of them and have no complaints whatsoever.
Click to expand...

thats sounds great... again... was NOT talking 64bit OS... and the tradeoff is you lose 32bit legacy support (still lots of apps that dont run 64)... in fact, I think Scratch still runs on
XP...

and ironically it was a BOXX rep who told me I was wasting $ wanting
more RAM than the 4Gb quoted... when I asked why so little RAM
and it did have the new i7 chips.

confusing as hell... not to mention Vista has been so unstable for pro apps
ask... Assimilate...

I appreciate this thread though as Im trying to spec a PC box but its so hard
to get a straight answer... and mac you dont worry about that...

my problem has never been with PC (linux rocks) its been Windlblows
 
Rudi Herbert said:
Beg to differ, it does make a difference and you can see it on applications that are multi-threaded. I just bough a Gateway FX workstation with am i-7 processor, 64 bit Vista and the rest of the niceties, and tagged 12 gigs iof Corsair dominator trichannel DDR3 ram on it, then overcloked the system to run at 3.2G .
Click to expand...

BTW. what was speed of your new i7 - pre overclock?
 
Tim Whitcomb said:
thats sounds great... again... was NOT talking 64bit OS... and the tradeoff is you lose 32bit legacy support (still lots of apps that dont run 64)... in fact, I think Scratch still runs on
XP...

and ironically it was a BOXX rep who told me I was wasting $ wanting
more RAM than the 4Gb quoted... when I asked why so little RAM
and it did have the new i7 chips.

confusing as hell... not to mention Vista has been so unstable for pro apps
ask... Assimilate...

I appreciate this thread though as Im trying to spec a PC box but its so hard
to get a straight answer... and mac you dont worry about that...

my problem has never been with PC (linux rocks) its been Windlblows
Click to expand...

I'm sorry. Respectfully Tim, I can't figure out what in the world you're talking about...

What did a BOXX rep tell you? I'm not following your point...

Vista is unstable? I can tell you we have extensively tested damn near every Pro app available for Windows in the lab as well as speaking with studios on a near daily basis. Pretty much every pro app I can think of is known to run quite well (stably and quickly) in Vista and Vista64 at this point. Including Scratch. (There just aren't any Quadro SDI drivers for Vista or Vista 64 yet)

Can't get legacy 32bit support? I've not heard of any instances where Windows XP64 or Vista 64 did not support the proper functioning of a 32 bit pro Windows application.

I'm not tryng to be a smartypants, I'm just letting you know it doesn't need to be as difficult (or bad) as maybe it seems to you...

Adam
BOXXlabs
 
Guys,

This is the system I got: http://www.gateway.com/systems/product/529668210.php
Again, it has limitations and perks, this is a consumer unit and it surely isn't a BOXX system, but at $1200 from Best Buy it was cheaper than all the options I could come up with for assembling something similar myself. Now, Dell has a similar system for $999 but the BIOS is fixed at the factory so you can't over clock it. Cons with the system I got:

- it has the "slowest" of the three i-7 processors, but if 2.66Ghz speed isn't enough, you can overclock it and take it over 3.2 GHz SAFELY. Even after that almost 40% increase in speed, it is amazing how cool the air coming out of the box feels when the computer is running at full throttle...
- it comes with only 3GB of RAM and slow RAM at that, so I bought 12 GB of Corsair dominator tri-channel memory from Tiger Direct ($800) which is a memory designed specifically for over clocking solutions. There's more expensive memory and certainly cheaper, but this is doing a great job for me. God bless all those gamers pushing computer technology for us video guys :-)
- Graphics card is nothing to write home about, but with about 1 GB of allocated video memory, it actually powers my 2 x 25.5 " Samsung monitors (I'm quite blind so I use two of those monsters) without a problem. If you want to do color critical work, then you need to add a dedicated card. I've ordered the Black Magic HD Link Extreme http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/decklinkhdextreme/ which will give me HDMI monitoring and a bunch of other goodies for more professional work.
- You still need to add an external video array for footage storage and add a couple of small internal drives to run your programs and the system files separately for optimum speed and reliability.

Again, this is NOT a professional system with all the bells and whistles, but for $2000 I got a monster of a computer that really performs tasks faster than systems that sold for 4 times as much just a couple of years ago. IT doesn't come with the tech service of a BOXX, but it sure rocks those Premiere and After Effects renders like a donkey chewing through wet grass...
 
Owen James said:
Hi Zakaree,

I did well with a system like this:

$229 Intel i7 Chip
$350 Gigabyte X58 UD5 Motherboard
$329 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OC 896MB GDDR3 PCIe 2.0 Graphic Card
Click to expand...

Hey Owen,

Do you know if Nvidia has fixed the apparent driver-bottleneck issue with the i7 architecture yet?

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-280,2156.html

Otherwise, I'd be careful with i7 and Nvidia cards for now. A safer bet would be something like the Radeon 4870, which will probably be softmodded in the coming months as well. Don't get me wrong either, I've used Nvidia cards in two of my own systems, so I hope the issue is fixed soon.

Edit: To clarify, I'm talking about the Geforce GTX 2xx series of Nvidia cards, not their workstation cards, which obviously use different drivers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top