Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Bokeh, eh?

D

Desert Rune

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 16, 2007
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Is it pronounced BO-keh, "bouquet", buuk-eh or bok-kah? I know 'Bokeh' is of Japanese origin so I am leaning to the last one.
 
I was wondering because I assisted a photographer several weeks ago and she pronounced it differently from 'bouquet'. I didn't want to sound like a newbie if I pronounced it wrong.

It's like when I hear people pronounce Neumann incorrectly, I'll naturally assume they are microphone noobs. :unsure:

One last thing, do you pronounce 'bouquet' as BO-KAY or boo-kay?
 
Desert Rune said:
I was wondering because I assisted a photographer several weeks ago and she pronounced it differently from 'bouquet'. I didn't want to sound like a newbie if I pronounced it wrong.

It's like when I hear people pronounce Neumann incorrectly, I'll naturally assume they are microphone noobs. :unsure:

One last thing, do you pronounce 'bouquet' as BO-KAY or boo-kay?
Click to expand...

Bouquet is pronounced "boo-kay"

Bokeh is pronounced "Bow-keh" (bow being pronounced as in bow and arrow)
 
where have you been evin?.. when you're not here, your absence counts..
 
okay, for that matter you're forgiven.. :whistling: i thought you had gone into a beach's party with gals brought from austria by sanjin :huh: and you didn't invite us.. :) but outside, there are a lot of threads which deserve your attention and a reply from your knowledge.. contax stuff (does it breathe?), etc..
 
'Bow-kay'?? How the heck does an 'keh' make any other sound than "meh"?
 
"I first learned about "bo-ke" or boke in 1995, from Carl Weese, who learned about it from our mutual friend the oracular and extreme Oren Grad, who holds eight Master's degrees, three Ph.D.s, and an M.D., and who evidently taught himself Japanese so he could read Japanese photo magazines. (Perhaps I exaggerate these facts, but only slightly.) I then commissioned and published three articles about it in the March/April 1997 issue of Photo Techniques back when I was editor — one each by John Kennerdell, who is an American ex-pat living in Bangkok, Oren himself, and Harold Merklinger, a high-ranking research scientist in the Canadian defense establishment. It's one of the few issues of that magazine that sold out. My own contribution was...er, a letter. I decided that people too readily mispronounced "boke," so I added an "h" to the word in our articles, and voilá, "bokeh" was born. A Google search for the word "bokeh" just now resulted in approximately 13,300 hits. Seems the idea's gotten around."
More>>
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-04-04-04.shtml

http://www.rickdenney.com/bokeh_test.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm

http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/bokeh.html
 
Agreed, Sanjin. "Bo - Ke" is actually a good way to remember it (as long as you keep the sounds separate). AFAIK, Japanese is all about a series of consonant-vowel combos (With occasional vowels). Bruce in Japanese is "Bu - Ru - Su". Sanjin would be "Sa(n) - Ji - Nu" (mandatory to add a vowel to the end). Evin would be "Ev - i - nu"... "Sha - Wu - Nu" "Cu - Ru - Tu" etc... Jaagdy, I'm working on yours, bro... how do I say your name in English properly?

Credit for this rudimentary Japanese understanding goes entirely to my Japanese girlfriend. I'll ask her about Bokeh when she has a moment. She's working long hours directing / editing "making of" features for crazy air freshener commecials right now though ;) How much more Japanese can you get than a crazy air freshener commercial? With singing, of course...

It looked like they were mixing film & HD cameras, though - so not sure about the bokeh ;)

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
 
Bruce Allen said:
Agreed, Sanjin. "Bo - Ke" is actually a good way to remember it (as long as you keep the sounds separate). AFAIK, Japanese is all about a series of consonant-vowel combos (With occasional vowels). Bruce in Japanese is "Bu - Ru - Su". Sanjin would be "Sa(n) - Ji - Nu" (mandatory to add a vowel to the end). Evin would be "Ev - i - nu"... "Sha - Wu - Nu" "Cu - Ru - Tu" etc... Jaagdy, I'm working on yours, bro... how do I say your name in English properly?

Credit for this rudimentary Japanese understanding goes entirely to my Japanese girlfriend. I'll ask her about Bokeh when she has a moment. She's working long hours directing / editing "making of" features for crazy air freshener commecials right now though ;) How much more Japanese can you get than a crazy air freshener commercial? With singing, of course...

It looked like they were mixing film & HD cameras, though - so not sure about the bokeh ;)

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
Click to expand...

hahaha nice post, Bruce. Jaadgy would be the same as in English "Jah-Jee" (with a strong J as in "judge"), without the u at the end 'cause it ends with a vowel.
 
I always said it like "poker", but you don't pronounce the "r" too much. Saying Bouquet sounds weird to me.
 
By the way about SANJIN in Japan:
"Sanjin is a god of the mountain in Sugawa
and also is thought to be a guardian of silk worms. There is a festival
on the eighty-eighth day from the New Year, and the shrine ground is
buried with visitors from nearby counties."

Sanjin Festival Sugawa, Strolling in Ueda>>More>>LINK

2048081m.jpg


2048082m.jpg


I could make a good career in Japan!? :blush: :biggrin:
 
The Third Man said:
A Google search for the word "bokeh" just now resulted in approximately 13,300 hits. Seems the idea's gotten around."
Click to expand...

Just an observation here, from someone reading the words of cinematographers since he was a teenager in the late '70's...

...Bokeh is to photography what Portobello mushrooms and extra virgin olive oil are to cooking.. the trendy "in" thing of the moment.

Go pull out back issues of American Cinematographer from the 60's/70's/80's and try to find one DP mentioning bokeh, or referring to the effect by any other name... I dare you all. Today, every youngling with an DV camcorder spouts off about bokeh before he will even tell you his name.

While you're there doing research on bokeh, you might as well check out how many old school DP's mention shallow depth of field as a desirable trait or a characteristic that they actively pursued in their work. From what I've been able to see, exploiting DOF emerged more from commercial photography than from the movies.

Can't wait to see what's gonna replace bokeh in a few years... I almost feel sorry for "breathing", as it never had a chance with exotic "bokeh" waiting in the wings to replace "shallow DOF"...

I'm only half joking here...
 
jaadgy akanni said:
hahaha nice post, Bruce. Jaadgy would be the same as in English "Jah-Jee" (with a strong J as in "judge"), without the u at the end 'cause it ends with a vowel.
Click to expand...

Excellent, Jah - Jee - san!

The Third Man said:
I could make a good career in Japan!? :blush: :biggrin:
Click to expand...

Absolutely! You will be mobbed with admirers. They love that stuff ;)

Jim Arthurs said:
J
Can't wait to see what's gonna replace bokeh in a few years... I almost feel sorry for "breathing", as it never had a chance with exotic "bokeh" waiting in the wings to replace "shallow DOF"...

I'm only half joking here...
Click to expand...

Totally agree. Going by your same reasoning pattern (taking a cue from the still world now), my guess is it will be DPs talking about various subtle / nuanced digital filters that are applied in post (maybe with realtime preview in camera)? I took a look at those back in my computer programming days. We are just at the beginning stages of some interesting stuff. Of course, on the other hand, we already have everything we need right now ;) It'll become like microphones and esoteric amps in the recording world, methinks...

Eg various skin softening, subtle pearlescence, HDR local contrast simulation, perceptual detail enhancement, hyper-accurate image-based film emulsion simulations... kinda like what we have now but more subtle and more immediate. There's going to debates about the organic feel of various algorithms, color space processing options (do I sharpen in LAB / YUV space or RGB space? Do I prefer my blurs in linear color space?), their suitability to the various sensor types, etc. Not to say that we'll get that technical (just as we don't need to know lens design to talk about bokeh) - but the aesthetics produced by different variations of those underlying technologies might be what DPs might pontificate about in the future? Learning, AI, image-based algorithms too. DPs will talk about matching a specially-trained "XYZ labs" filter to a particular actress's face... when what they should have just been doing was get the producer to hire a better makeup artist ;)

It'll be interesting to see how much is looking forwards and how much is looking backwards.

Okay, need to get off the forums and pack some suitcases now... what an excellent trove of info the Red forums are, and such nice and knowledgeable people too. Make cool films, Red users! Look forward to reading tons more cool posts from all of my old friends when I find the internet again ;) And please take care of yourselves. I want to have the pleasure of meeting you all some day.

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
 
Jim Arthurs said:
While you're there doing research on bokeh, you might as well check out how many old school DP's mention shallow depth of field as a desirable trait or a characteristic that they actively pursued in their work. From what I've been able to see, exploiting DOF emerged more from commercial photography than from the movies.
Click to expand...
To be fair (and I totally agree with your points re: overuse of the word bokeh!), that's a technology/format related issue, not trend related. If you look back to the 70's (or even way earlier, to the 50's at least) you will find cinematographers discussing manipulation of DoF - just the other way! For a famous instance, the cinematography in Citizen Kane is lauded for it's (very deliberate) use of almost exclusively deep DoF - something very difficult to achieve in those days with the film, lenses and lighting equipment available. Getting a shallow DoF was never a problem, as everyone was shooting on 35mm!!

Now, fast forward to the current day, and all but the absolute top-end of professionals are shooting on formats smaller than 35mm - 2/3" SD/HD, Super-16, 1/3" DV/HDV/Etc... So the problem for today's cinematographers (especially the up and coming ones) is attaining a shallow DoF instead of a deep one. The issue of manipulating DoF has not changed, just the direction of the problem!...

There is, of course, an associated "cinematic feel" to shallow DoF, but that's simply because it's associated with the larger format for the above reasons - I certainly like to use shallow DoF on occasions, but I also like a fantastic composition in deep DoF - all techniques are good techniques when used well and for the right reasons, and bad techniques when not!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top