Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Best Lens for 96-120FPS Monochrome Footage/Still capture-Wild Gorilla subject

Grayson Fahrner

Active member
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Manhattan
I'm filming gorillas in the wild and will likely be doing some of it at 96-120FPS with a helium monochrome sensor.

What prime and/or zoom lenses can maximize the resolution advantage of the windowed sensor both in video and stills format? I shoot nikon and have all of the main focal lengths but was wondering if there is a cinematic prime out there that will really make the black and white footage pop with contrast and resolution to take advantage of the footage from the windowed monochrome sensor at 96-120 FPS...

The stills lenses I have are sharp enough obviously, and I'll likely be bringing the 19-90 and 85-300 Fujinons, but I'd like a cinematic quality lens that can take advantage of lens flare, depth of field, and invoke a "dreamy" or cinematic look to the gorillas as well as close-ups of chimpanzees. Thanks!
 
I really question the use of a Monochrome and the 96+ frame rate goal. What's the point? You have waaaay more post production flexibility with shooting color and the high frame rate is going to increase your compression and shorten your shutter duration . . . risking underexposure and a bunch of noise. What is driving the Monochrome decision? Seems a bit odd and limiting to go into a huge unknown with a very specialized camera. BTW, I own a Mono

Any modern zoom lens will suit you fine and certainly won't make or break your ultimate production. In reading about your experience elsewhere on this forum with gear of this level . . . I would maybe spend some time getting some practical knowledge before packing your bags and jetting off into the mist ;-)
 
You might be thinking that using a Mono will make you the next Sam Jones. In his Off Camera series, he uses the Mono to focus the viewers attention to the guest's spoken words and personality - rather than distractions like the color of their clothes, make-up or complexion that day. He also has them dress in black and white to further extend this concept.

I'm really not understanding how using a Mono in the deep forest on subjects that will tonally blend into their surroundings will work. You do understand that gorillas and deep jungle foliage are the same basic gray tone. It is the chromatic differences that will allow the visual isolation of them from background. You might want to go to the local Zoo with a rented Mono to test out your concepts before dumping a bunch of money into the project. Unless money is no object that is . . .
 
I have never shot monochrome. I have never shot red. I have never shot video of any serious quality whatsoever. I do have extensive stills experience in far flung places.

99.9% of the users on this forum know more about how to use this type of camera than me. I know more about filming 5 feet in front of a 500lb wild silverback in a central African country than 99.9% of the users on here. That's it-and that's why I came here for advice which has been very helpful. These gorillas will likely be extinct in 10 years, they are our largest living relative and virtually nobody has heard of or seen them, and so I think they are an appropriate subject to stretch my comfort zone for financially and technically. The rainy season starts in March and lasts for 6 months which is why I'm racing up the learning curve for this trip so fast without getting the necessary experience first.

Gorillas are all black, with the exception of their eyes which are strikingly amber to be truthful. However, greens of the jungle distract; there is no pretty blue sky to be had because it's either covered or overexposed relative to the gorillas. Everything else is dark, and I need light, hence the monochrome.

Slow motion enhances their movements, which are subtle; in order to pick up on this I need focal length range. Windowing the sensor gets me closer without needing to haul heavy lenses through hours of jungle. I also can shoulder rig or possibly hand-hold such lenses and have more reach and maneuverability in dense forest where things are easy to trip on.

The option of 120FPS also enhances stability in post, gives me increased range, and lengthens the footage that I can gain from 1 hour each day that you're allowed to spend with wild gorillas in Congo. The shoot is very limited, and so that is why I will try to film with two cameras at the same time to double my footage at two different focal lengths and frame/resolutions. I can turn that one hour into two, with a diversity of FPS and focal range footage. That's why the equipment is overkill relative to my technical abilities.

Pulling stills will also be a priority and while the resolution is lowered at 6,5, and 4k, the shutter speed will be far more appropriate to playing, fighting, running, swinging, and eating gorillas than 1/48. You can't pull stills at that slow shutter. To increase the shutter speed for better stills acquisition, upping the FPS is a natural solution and under reduced resolution the advantage of the monochrome in overall resolution and noise levels at the same light levels should, all else be equal, be superior to grabbing stills from the same environment from a color camera.

I do appreciate the replies and knowledge shared and in no way am I dismissive of people's thoughts, this isn't a soccer league where you get trophies for just showing up with shoddy effort and prep...I appreciate the criticism and pointing out of weaknesses in my approach. Thanks! Still looking for the right lens and/or color filters to apply to make the footage pop in a jungle scene. I appreciate all the feedback.
 
You really should start here:
http://www.red.com/reducation

Then rent some gear and get some experience with a local RED User. No amount of expensive gear or forum chat will replace practical knowledge acquired by experience with those in the business.

To your Mono concept. If you look at your photo here:
https://graysonfahrner.photoshelter.com/portfolio/C0000PZ_2JTpSGW8/G0000KGVUVlJ6gUI/I00002REWzKqmi7c

You lighten the foliage, since it was shot in color, by selecting the Green band then adjusting it independently from the other colors. LightRoom made this real easy but so does any video color program as well. With Mono you have no color and one tone: Black
 
Grayson, I would be using the Cannon L series, I have seen Paul Nicklen uses I think the 70-200 or sometimes something bigger. The Monochrone definitly will give you another stop light and is beautiful how it looks. The color wont get you the same DR than a full Monochrome.

Also dependes how close you are but Since its Jungle and hard enviorment I wouldnt go with PL Cinema lenses, some canon should do it, and they focus electronic controls for canon lenses. Also if you have to be light which I think you need to. I will also might take as option this lenses from RED that are really small and portable. https://global-dynamics-united.myshopify.com/collections/all
 
No vested interest here, as the OP isn't renting a Mono from me...

Helium mono is dramatically better than monstro in low light. With respect, most people have not had the opportunity to test.
While I appreciate that tonal separation on monochrome can be a challenge, the two most successful applications of the camera I've seen have been jungle animals and natural landscapes.

Nikon lenses are the best you'll get for this work - we specifically recommend the Nikons for monochrome and IR work on our Helium and Dragon Monochromes.

The only down side with Nikon is that establish camera ops find the manual focus rotation confusing to their muscle memory - you won't face that issue,
I'd recommend taking good screw on colour filters to assist in popping the contrast - unlike on a colour camera you're not sacrificing IQ when you do this.

One matter I do have an interest to declare in: I'd also recommend you pick up an IR spectrum or Full Spectrum OLPF for the helium to augment the tonal separation and low light opportunities.

Happy to consult properly if the OP wants to contact me - my company has equipped and advised major wildlife productions with exactly these requirements and challenges.
 
No vested interest here, as the OP isn't renting a Mono from me...

Helium mono is dramatically better than monstro in low light. With respect, most people have not had the opportunity to test.
While I appreciate that tonal separation on monochrome can be a challenge, the two most successful applications of the camera I've seen have been jungle animals and natural landscapes.

Nikon lenses are the best you'll get for this work - we specifically recommend the Nikons for monochrome and IR work on our Helium and Dragon Monochromes.

The only down side with Nikon is that establish camera ops find the manual focus rotation confusing to their muscle memory - you won't face that issue,
I'd recommend taking good screw on colour filters to assist in popping the contrast - unlike on a colour camera you're not sacrificing IQ when you do this.

One matter I do have an interest to declare in: I'd also recommend you pick up an IR spectrum or Full Spectrum OLPF for the helium to augment the tonal separation and low light opportunities.

Happy to consult properly if the OP wants to contact me - my company has equipped and advised major wildlife productions with exactly these requirements and challenges.

Sounds cool. What jungle / wildlife productions have been shot on Mono? Anything online we can see?
 
BTW Grayson, John Merchant is probably the most knowledgeable source on the planet on all things RED Mono. If money is no object, I would see if John would work on a consulting basis to personally get you up to speed in a private workshop style capacity. Since you have no prior RED camera experience it is way more important to get hands on time, via a knowledgeable mentor, rather than worry about lens choice and other gear
 
BTW Grayson, John Merchant is probably the most knowledgeable source on the planet on all things RED Mono. If money is no object, I would see if John would work on a consulting basis to personally get you up to speed in a private workshop style capacity. Since you have no prior RED camera experience it is way more important to get hands on time, via a knowledgeable mentor, rather than worry about lens choice and other gear

+1 to that! Probably the best advice I've seen in the two threads about this hahaha
 
Helium Monochrome owner here.

Zeb, the use of monochrome is hard to justify, but for me it's purely emotional. I have made none to very little ROI with the monochrome, yet I still can't part with it... I need to shoot my projects with it. It's the largest emotional investment I have ever made.

John, I have to agree with the Nikon suggestion. I would take it to another level and recommend the use of vintage Nikkor-O glass. The combination of these lenses with the monochrome is to die for...

Grayson, I am happy to give you advice and answer any questions if you need guidance. And DO seek advice from John.. he definitely knows what he's talking about..! I definitely second the use of B/W colour contrast filters as they are the only way to control colour contrast. As for your search for a dreamy look, I would recommend the exploration of anamorphic or the use of diffusion filtration..!
 
Last edited:
Windowing the sensor gets me closer without needing to haul heavy lenses through hours of jungle.

In theory. Windowing the sensor simply reduces the amount of information you're capturing but does nothing to augment your focal length or the physics of your optics. Better off shooting full frame and punching in in post.
 
Pre-record is something that comes in super handy when working with unpredictable subjects. Hoping you employed it, as being several weeks too late won't help much on the big day. There is the future, though!
 
Back
Top