Job ter Burg
Well-known member
Highlights from the presentation in Burbank:
http://apps.avid.com/getmc/video-brbnk/?elq_mid=4656&elq_cid=4041780%20
http://apps.avid.com/getmc/video-brbnk/?elq_mid=4656&elq_cid=4041780%20
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Highlights from the presentation in Burbank:
http://apps.avid.com/getmc/video-brbnk/?elq_mid=4656&elq_cid=4041780%20
i think people get too caught up on a product that doesn't emphasize has much on the home editing experience. FCP was a great tool because it was intuitive and easy to set up and get going. but Avid has very complex tools that do a lot of things, integral to a post production environment that involves a lot of moving parts, software, hardware, etc. From broadcast to hollywood, as much as the argument that other NLE's are getting dominant, Avid is still the most trusted NLE for some of the biggest jobs. A lot of major tv networks are still all avid based, and hollywood still uses it a lot too. Just because they are features that mean nothing to you or the way you work, doesn't mean it isn't integral for other productions. When you have a TV episode with a 1 week turn around, something like "script sync" is gonna save you a ton of time organizing your clips. I've used it, it's awesome.
not to mention that Avid has always been good with their legacy products, older avid systems can still open modern avid projects within a certain level. I had a friend who handed off a fcp 7 project to someone at the CW, and they couldn't open it because they were still running FCP 6 there.
there are a lot of good unique things about avid, and just because it's not typically a freelancer's home user's cup of tea, doesn't lesson the product. I'm really excited for a lot of these new features, and if anything all this stuff on the horizon makes this so much easier for this to be a substitute for FCP because FCP X is just something I"m really not getting into. And just a side not about getting to cutting the story. award winning editors have won working on fcp and avid over the years. it's not the NLE, it's the editor. the NLE is just a enabler for their creativity, and that in the end is just about who you are.
What do you nominate to replace LUTs?
EDIT: to answer the question, I think that LUTs, either 1D or 3D, will be used for the next 100 years, I think. Consumers won't know they're being used, but they will be there under the hood.
EDIT EDIT: Actually, I don't think I do understand the question. Sorry?
Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
Thanks Job !Highlights from the presentation in Burbank:
http://apps.avid.com/getmc/video-brbnk/?elq_mid=4656&elq_cid=4041780%20
Bruce,
It was valley girl speak. I was joking and forgot to add theto my post.
David
Hey,
I watched the video of the event. AVID was smart to go to Hollywood. That is where there massive foothold and a very specific segment of the editing market. It will be nice to see the 64 bit version on a MAC. it's so funny to hear AVID talk about openness. That marks a huge culture shift.
David
I had no idea about all of these recent changes