Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Avid outputs at 59.94 playing back at 2x speed?

Ben Pluimer

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles
(Cross posting this from the workflow section in case this gets more eyeballs on it)

We're doing camera tests for a network show, and post has requested our 4kHD 29.97 files to be transcoded to 720p 59.94 Dnxhd 145. I don't have Avid on my machine so I can't see exactly what's going on, but they tell me the transcoded files are playing back at what looks like 200%. Is there a different process I should use (ie output from RedCine at 29.97, and then convert to 59.94?

Link to the file in question: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2302114/A007_C001V019FCC0001.mxf

Can anyone offer me some transcode advice or solutions to this? Thanks.
 
If possible, always shoot in the deliverable timecode. What is happening here is the output sees the first 30 frames you shot (which is a second of playback at 29.97) and is assuming they are the first 30 frames of a 60-frame second. That's why the motion is fast. Is there any reason why you were shooting at a different frame rate than they were expecting for delivery? Is it possible for them to edit off of 29.97?
 
Also, which version of Avid are you using? MC 5.x and beyond support mixed timecode sequences, so they should be able to bring it into a 720p 59.94 project as a 29.97 clip.
 
This is all coming from the network post department, so I'm not sure which version they are using. We shot and delivered a 29.97 file and that worked perfectly, but because of broadcast standards they have asked for a 59.94 test. The scarlet does not shoot 59.94 at 4kHD, hence the needed conversion. My suggestion might be to edit in 29.97 and output at 59.94, but I want to accommodate them as best as I can for now.
 
I have had this issue with NHK here in Japan (after shooting a show on my Scarlet when the HD-CAM decided to call it quits 3 hrs away from Tokyo). Make sure to confirm that the 59.94 is or isn't interlaced. NHK needed all shots (shot at 29.97 progressive) to be transcoded to DVCPRO-HD at 59.94 1080i (interlaced)...

If it is progressive - you might have a problem, as 30P (29.97) does not scale to 60P (59.94) without strobing (each frame is duplicated). You will need to use post software (FCP, Compressor, or really anything else) to re-time the 30P to 60P (slow down to 50%). For higher quality results you will need to use TWIXTER or something like the Kronos on Nuke - which is time-consuming...

Peter
 
I have had this issue with NHK here in Japan (after shooting a show on my Scarlet when the HD-CAM decided to call it quits 3 hrs away from Tokyo). Make sure to confirm that the 59.94 is or isn't interlaced. NHK needed all shots (shot at 29.97 progressive) to be transcoded to DVCPRO-HD at 59.94 1080i (interlaced)...

If it is progressive - you might have a problem, as 30P (29.97) does not scale to 60P (59.94) without strobing (each frame is duplicated). You will need to use post software (FCP, Compressor, or really anything else) to re-time the 30P to 60P (slow down to 50%). For higher quality results you will need to use TWIXTER or something like the Kronos on Nuke - which is time-consuming...

Peter

So would the solution be to shoot and edit at 29.97, and then convert to 59.94 for output?
 
Back
Top