Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Average stagehand at Lincoln Center in NYC makes $290K a year

Status
Not open for further replies.

Danno Anderson

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Points
0
BELTWAY CONFIDENTIAL
POLITICS FROM THE NATION'S CAPITAL
The power of unions: Average stagehand at Lincoln Center in NYC makes $290K a year
TAGS: benefits carnegie hall lincoln center salaries stagehands union excess
COMMENTS (44) SHARE PRINT
By: Mark Hemingway 12/27/10 11:16 AM

Columnist James Ahearn of New Jersey's Bergen Record has a great column today on, of all things, the stagehands at New York city's top performing arts venues such as Lincoln Center and Carnegie Hall. These are not highly skilled or technical jobs but take a gander at how much they are paid:

At Avery Fisher Hall and Alice Tully Hall in Lincoln Center, the average stagehand salary and benefits package is $290,000 a year.

To repeat, that is the average compensation of all the workers who move musicians' chairs into place and hang lights, not the pay of the top five.

Across the plaza at the Metropolitan Opera, a spokesman said stagehands rarely broke into the top-five category. But a couple of years ago, one did. The props master, James Blumenfeld, got $334,000 at that time, including some vacation back pay.

Ahern also notes that the top paid stagehand at Carnegie Hall makes $422,599 a year in salary, plus $107,445 in benefits and deferred compensation. So why such exorbitant pay? You probably already guessed that a union is involved:

How to account for all this munificence? The power of a union, Local 1 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees. "Power," as in the capacity and willingness to close most Broadway theaters for 19 days two years ago when agreement on a new contract could not be reached.

Wakin reported that this power was palpable in the nervousness of theater administrators and performers who were asked to comment on the salary figures.

Kelly Hall-Tompkins, for one, said, "The last thing I want to do is upset the people at Carnegie Hall. I'd like to have a lifelong relationship with them." She is a violinist who recently presented a recital in Weill Hall, one of the smaller performance spaces in the building.

She said she begrudged the stagehands nothing: "Musicians should be so lucky to have a strong union like that." Uh-huh.

Be sure and read Ahearn's whole column. And next time someone tells you unions are just about fair wages for an honest day's labor, remember that's not always the case. All too often they're about power and greed. This is also true for public sector unions -- see the cover story in today's Examiner on the pay of local officials in the DC area, "Salaries of local government brass top Biden's, Cabinet secretaries."

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs...coln-center-nyc-makes-290k-year#ixzz19LhU5ELF
 
So it's not OK for a stagehand working year round at one of the premier performing arts centers in the world to make $290K a year? Sure, when you are there watching the show you see them add a chair and music stand. What you don't see is them running around backstage, behind the scenes, making sure the show is technically perfect. Oh, and lets not forget the hours upon hours, day after day, working non-stop around the clock to get everything ready for this show. That stage didn't build itself. The lights didn't hang themselves, or program themselves. It takes hard work to make a show.


FTA: "The work has to be done, for three stages, with 800 events a season, and it requires expertise and experience.

The five men practically live in the building in season, often working from 8 a.m. to past midnight. Their average workweek is 80 hours. After 40 hours, the pay goes up to time-and-a-half, then to double or triple time. They get extra pay for recordings made in the hall."

Sounds like they are busting their asses for that money to me.
 
As you see, they make their salaries (more than most doctors) by threatening to "shut down" productions who don't meet their demands.

In my opinion, it's better to be paid based on the merits of what your contributions are worth, rather than this type of organized extortion.

Do you think Emmanuel Lubezki needs a union to get paid what he deserves? No. Because he's an awesome cinematographer, and people will pay what it takes to get him involved in their picture, because he adds value to a film.
 
I never understood the mentality of being angry at somebody because they negotiated a good deal and they work hard. They aren't making all this money with 40 hr weeks, and paid vacations. An 80 hour week means you don't get to see your kids. Most of the money they are making is in OT. That requires a level of bulldog determination that a lot of people just don't have. Lets see how many people think it's too much money after they work 80+ hours a week, for 3 months straight.

Nick
 
What a joke. I know auto mechanics and trash truck drivers who "bust their ass" too. Should they be pulling in $300K a year? As you see, they make their salaries (more than most doctors) by threatening to "shut down" productions who don't meet their demands.

In my opinion, it's better to be paid based on the merits of what your contributions are worth, rather than this type of organized extortion.

Should auto executives be pulling in tens of millions of dollars a year?


Do you think Emmanuel Lubezki needs a union to get paid what he deserves? No. Because he's an awesome cinematographer, and people will pay what it takes to get him involved in their picture, because he adds value to a film.

No but his gaffer does.
 
Maybe I'm missing the point. Someone explain why we should we care what these guys make again?

Good on them for finding a job that pays that well without requiring some advanced degree.

If there's one thing I've learned in life it's that the other guy's job always seems easier but rarely is.
 
If there's really that much overtime more people should be hired.

On the topic of "deserves". I've done LOTS of heavy lifting over the years in many places and been around LOTS of people working similarly hard--none of us were ever paid like that. In my opinion, "deserves" to be paid $290k should be "very fortunate" to be paid $290k and is best followed up with a very grateful attitude.
 
Maybe I'm missing the point. Someone explain why we should we care what these guys make again?

Because there hasn't been anything newsworthy re: Epic cameras in the last couple days :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top