Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

As many different Red SENSORS as there are FILM STOCKS....well sort of.

Martin Stevens

REDuser Sponsor
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
1,892
Reaction score
6
Points
38
Location
Massachusetts
I would love for Red to offer in the future just as many Red SENSORS as there are FILM STOCKS....well sort of.

I would love to see Red sell a variety of sensors for their cameras so you can choose which sensor you want.

So for example, when you buy your Epic you could buy it with lets say an ISO 100 Daylight Sensor, or an ISO 100 Tungsten Sensor.
Some operators might want an ISO 2000 Tungsten Sensor etc. etc.

This idea is obviously not new, but I would love to see the future of digital cinema have lots of sensor options.
One day Red and others will probably have a single sensor that can cover all our needs and so the
world of multiple sensors will no longer be needed.....perhaps.

I'm still interested in the user or Red installable OLPF ND filters for the Epic etc.

So, what comes after the DRAGON.........? The future looks fantastic. Thank you RED.
 
Sounds fun! At least the user installable ND's would be good. It would certainly make things more complicated for the world of RED and misinformation. The tungsten sensor I think wold just mean that there was a CTB filter in there though.
 
I can see the use of a CTB filter added to the OLPF, but hopefully one day sensors will be able to be natively Tungsten, or
so sensitive that setting the image to Tungsten doesn't have any issues.
 
From Broadcas Engineering:
The ITU-R Recommendation lays out the quality standards for UHDTV in two levels. The first, a 4K version, has the equivalent of about 8 megapixels (3840 x 2160 image system), and the second, an 8K version has the equivalent of about 32 megapixels (7680 x 4320 image system). Other UHDTV picture quality improvements include greater color fidelity and options for a higher number frame rate.
 
Any news on the user installable ND's would be good.
 
Tungsten etc. you just filter... ditto for ND.

But I have given the analogy before of Nikon: D3x vs. D3s. It's tricky to make a one size fits all sensor, most especially when the target market includes both cinema and stills pros (DSMC, remember - don't lose sight of that!)

Giving a choice of at least two; small photosite / high res and large photosite / lower res (but much faster / lower noise floor) is an idea that might have some traction. It clearly works for Nikon, and they know a thing or two about making and selling cameras...

Mike
 
The sensor is really the last part in a camera I would want to touch / change. That sounds like the best way to get dust and backfocus issues, and even to break it.... You can achieve so many different looks in post while color grading, you can downconvert if you lees less pixels (oversampling is always good), you can add NDs while shooting if there is too much light....

There is one point though in which I would be interested to hear if there has been any progress, that's the integrated ND filters that were supposed to be exchangeable in the camera. But even that, I'm not so sure I would want to change it in the field...
 
Same here I would be much more interested in integrated ND than interchangeable sensors...
IMHO the sensor is more flexible than film and doesn't require such change, plus I'd feel uncomfortable changing the sensor, already the mount is more than enough.
 
I was hoping to have multiple cameras (one day) with multiple sensors already installed.

So I would just switch between cameras depending on the shot/scene.

:)
 
How about instead of different sensors, different chassis. You could mix and match and have a different colored camera for every day of the week.
Obviously the Black Epic would be for evening productions.:sarcasm:
I agree with David, the reason for a very versatile sensor is to help you have a very good tool for many situations and not be dragging a bunch of different sensors around because they only have certain looks.
 
Back
Top