Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Any idea about the MPx (MegaPixells) for stills?

Quick question. I have a 10.1 MP Canon Rebel XTi with some good glass and the images from that are SIGNIFICANTLY sharper, deeper, better tonal range and color than any sample footage (stills) I've seen from the Red One. I realize one is a still and one a motion camera, but I'm just curious why no one has been able to produce a single still image that compares to an "out-of-the-box" Rebel XTi image using even the best Zeiss lens and lighting conditions. Seems like file size in pixels is being confused with resolution, depth and tonal quality.

If someone has a still to prove me wrong, please post it here...I really want to believe the RED can give me better stills with same glass than my XTi.

-shooter
 
shooter said:
Quick question. I have a 10.1 MP Canon Rebel XTi with some good glass and the images from that are SIGNIFICANTLY sharper, deeper, better tonal range and color than any sample footage (stills) I've seen from the Red One. I realize one is a still and one a motion camera, but I'm just curious why no one has been able to produce a single still image that compares to an "out-of-the-box" Rebel XTi image using even the best Zeiss lens and lighting conditions. Seems like file size in pixels is being confused with resolution, depth and tonal quality.

If someone has a still to prove me wrong, please post it here...I really want to believe the RED can give me better stills with same glass than my XTi.

-shooter
Click to expand...

Well - first post Your still so the others have something to compete with... :innocent:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top