Angenieux Optimo DP Rouge 16-42 mm matched 3D lenses

[Ross Isaacs]

I have a set of Angenieux Optima DP Rouge 16-42mm matched 3D lenses I want to use on Dragon cameras. Does anyone know if we will get coverage from these lenses and if not what limitations will we have with the image area?

 

[Jack Allred]

6k Dragon will have significant vignetting. 5k Dragon will be beautiful.

 

[Jeff Kilgroe]

The 16-42 fully covers Dragon to about 5.5K at all focal lengths. For coverage at 6K FF we see noticeable vignetting at the wider focal lengths. I want to say that we get full coverage back when longer than 18~19mm, but would have to look again. I need to test some other stuff later tonight or in the morning, I can add this to my list and post results...

 

[Ross Isaacs]

The 16-42 fully covers Dragon to about 5.5K at all focal lengths. For coverage at 6K FF we see noticeable vignetting at the wider focal lengths. I want to say that we get full coverage back when longer than 18~19mm, but would have to look again. I need to test some other stuff later tonight or in the morning, I can add this to my list and post results...

Thanks so much Jeff we are considering if we should sell the 16-42 and replace it with the new version 16-40 but am wondering if there will be the same problem at the wide end of the lens?

 

[Jean Wallez]

They have exactly the same circle of confusion : 31.4mm/sensor surface: 22x16mm; the back is shorter, PL standard mount, Canon or Nikon mount, 1.4 and 2 multiplier usable.

 

[Mauricio Handler]

Any thoughts on the angle of coverage at 5k at 16 and 42mm?
Thanks .