Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Angenieux 20-120mm T2.9

PaulClements

PaulClements

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
1,995
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
47
Website
www.pclements.co.uk
Has anyone any experience or know of anything shot with the Angenieux 20-120mm T2.9? It's a relatively cheap cine lense by all accounts and I'd be very interested in seeing even some stills if anyone knows.

Does anyone know of a good site that does cine lense comparisons?
 
PaulClements said:
Has anyone any experience or know of anything shot with the Angenieux 20-120mm T2.9? It's a relatively cheap cine lense by all accounts and I'd be very interested in seeing even some stills if anyone knows.

Does anyone know of a good site that does cine lense comparisons?
Click to expand...

Hi,

Its a 1960's lens, OK at the time but nothing compared with a Cooke 20-100.
I have one I bought on Ebay from Aardman Animations.

As lenses vary, you actually need to test the lens that you intend to use. This is very true of pre 1980 lenses.

Stephen
 
Thanks for that Stephen, the picture that accompanied the lense certainly doesn't look like it's from the 60's, I'm guessing they're either mistaken or are pulling a fast one:

1170357101.jpg
 
PaulClements said:
Thanks for that Stephen, the picture that accompanied the lense certainly doesn't look like it's from the 60's, I'm guessing they're either mistaken or are pulling a fast one:

1170357101.jpg
Click to expand...

Hi Paul,

I thought they came out in the mid seventies, but I could be wrong. Stephen is very knowledgable on this subject. I worked on quite a few of them and they could be a very good lens. If the one in the photo is the actual lens it sure is a clean one. I don't know if they cover super 35 or not as there was no S-35 back then. lol

Chuck
 
Hi Chuck,

Is the lens in the picture actually the correct one then? And I agree it is a very clean one, perhaps they've taken a stock photograph and used that but if memory serves me correct they had different lenses for sale and the images had the same lighting and background although the lenses appeared older and more used. Perhaps whoever owned this one simply didn't like it and never used it! :)

Paul
 
PaulClements said:
Hi Chuck,

Is the lens in the picture actually the correct one then? And I agree it is a very clean one, perhaps they've taken a stock photograph and used that but if memory serves me correct they had different lenses for sale and the images had the same lighting and background although the lenses appeared older and more used. Perhaps whoever owned this one simply didn't like it and never used it! :)

Paul
Click to expand...

Hi Paul,

Well it sure looks like every 6x20 I had in hand. Yeah that photo looks like a professional product shot to me. Nice lighting, mayby the owner does product shooting as a regular gig... As always "Buyer Beware" If you can get the lens for testing and have access to a shop with a collimator and a thru the lens projector and a decent optical tech, then you can get answers to some important questions. Such as; does it hold focus down the range, does it track straight and does it cover the intended format of choice.

Chuck
 
Hi,

I could be wrong with date, as it's before my time as a shooter. The Cooke 20-100 is from 1971. I am guessing it was released in the 1960's, sure it was produced for many years.

I don't think this is the lens for a 4k camera (IMHO)

Stephen
 
Hi Stephen,

The first Cooke 20-100 was indeed made in 1971, but like with all lenses they have slight refinements over time albeit fairly cosmetic, and since the 18-200 wasn't introduced until 1987 I would imagine they continued manufacturing the 20-100 into the 80's.

Out of interest why would you say this is not a lens for a 4k camera though? Whilst it is 35mm and not s35 would it not be better than a decent nikon? The only problem I can foresee is that you would be losing some of the space on the sensor and therefore a smaller resolution for the final image, but the benefits of using cine glass over still must still be acceptable no?

Paul
 
PaulClements said:
Hi Stephen,

The first Cooke 20-100 was indeed made in 1971, but like with all lenses they have slight refinements over time albeit fairly cosmetic, and since the 18-200 wasn't introduced until 1987 I would imagine they continued manufacturing the 20-100 into the 80's.

Out of interest why would you say this is not a lens for a 4k camera though? Whilst it is 35mm and not s35 would it not be better than a decent nikon? The only problem I can foresee is that you would be losing some of the space on the sensor and therefore a smaller resolution for the final image, but the benefits of using cine glass over still must still be acceptable no?

Paul
Click to expand...

Hi,

The Cooke 20-100 AFAIK remained optically & mechanically the same for many years until the 18-100 was introduced. Optically the 20-100 is still very acceptable today. I am fairly sure they will produce good results with a Red, however until I get a camera in my hand I can't be sure.

When you look through an old Arg 25-250 or 20-120 (Ebay prices $250-750) you will see distortion, color fringing, breathing. If you were to work at T8 it might just be OK. Don't hold your breath for high quality pictures, you will be dissapointed (IMHO)

Stephen
 
Stephen Williams said:
Hi,

The Cooke 20-100 AFAIK remained optically & mechanically the same for many years until the 18-100 was introduced. Optically the 20-100 is still very acceptable today. I am fairly sure they will produce good results with a Red, however until I get a camera in my hand I can't be sure.

When you look through an old Arg 25-250 or 20-120 (Ebay prices $250-750) you will see distortion, color fringing, breathing. If you were to work at T8 it might just be OK. Don't hold your breath for high quality pictures, you will be dissapointed (IMHO)

Stephen
Click to expand...

Hi Stephen.

My Angenieux zoom can beat up your Cooke zoom! (except for that one of yours with the funny focal length and apreture markings). I agree with you about the 10x25. But I must say I have seen very nice 6x20's. If one were to have a chance to look at a sample on the Red camera I think it might be worth the effort. You never know, you might just stumble into one of the good ones.

Yours,
Chuck Colburn
 
chuck colburn said:
Hi Stephen.

My Angenieux zoom can beat up your Cooke zoom! (except for that one of yours with the funny focal length and apreture markings). I agree with you about the 10x25. But I must say I have seen very nice 6x20's. If one were to have a chance to look at a sample on the Red camera I think it might be worth the effort. You never know, you might just stumble into one of the good ones.

Yours,
Chuck Colburn
Click to expand...

Hi Chuck,

I understand that 1 company used to optomise Angenieux zooms, charged by the hour...........

I shall keep that 20-60 Cooke then!

Stephen
 
I'd agree, Cooke would always be my choice. All the research points that way. But seeing a lense such as the one i pointed out in the condition it was at a vastly lower price than a slightly worn looking Cooke lense made me wonder.

Thanks for the info Stephen & Chuck
 
PaulClements said:
Has anyone any experience or know of anything shot with the Angenieux 20-120mm T2.9? It's a relatively cheap cine lense by all accounts and I'd be very interested in seeing even some stills if anyone knows.

Does anyone know of a good site that does cine lense comparisons?
Click to expand...

I shot several movies with this lens in early 1980s. I didn't have a comparable Cooke lens to compare at that time. The prime set that was available to me was the first generation Zeiss Super Speeds T1.4 lenses characterized by the 3-blade iris, very distinct in the bokeh of light bulbs. The Angenieux zoom did a decent job in comparison, not great but very usable in terms of resolution and contrast.

Before this lens came out, only early version of Angenieux 25-250mm T3.9 zoom (pretty inferior, optically) was available for the film industry I was workng in. The new zoom was a major advancement as it was a stop faster and (significant) 5mm wider, not to mention it focuses a lot closer.

This 20-120mm was later replaced by the current model, the more popular 17-102mm T2.9. Initially, it looked like the new lens was just adding a wide angle conversion lens to the front element of the 20-120mm because the zoom power and the maximum aperture were almost exactly the same. It felt much bulkier and heavier, though.

Surprisingly, it turned out the new lens was optically much better product, together with the precious 3mm wider angle of view and being a current model, it became much more "recognized" by the industry.

To make a long story short, the 20-120mm is a decent lens, good enough to make decent films and would give good representation of your cinematography skills. I am actually pleasently surprised to find its relatively low used price in the market. If you can't afford a RED Zoom or can't wait that long for it, find a good used Angenieux, you can't go wrong, especially if you like the creamy look of the French optics like the 5.3-61mm HD zoom I am currently using.

For the price of a good new still camera zoom, you get a 6:1 quite usable cine style T2.9 lens, what else do you expect?
 
I got burned with my 12-12o ANG - it gave me a 1970's look on everything I shot with it which was not the desired effect. Buyer beware!
 
AIO Films said:
I shot several movies with this lens in early 1980s. I didn't have a comparable Cooke lens to compare at that time. The prime set that was available to me was the first generation Zeiss Super Speeds T1.4 lenses characterized by the 3-blade iris, very distinct in the bokeh of light bulbs. The Angenieux zoom did a decent job in comparison, not great but very usable in terms of resolution and contrast.

Before this lens came out, only early version of Angenieux 25-250mm T3.9 zoom (pretty inferior, optically) was available for the film industry I was workng in. The new zoom was a major advancement as it was a stop faster and (significant) 5mm wider, not to mention it focuses a lot closer.

This 20-120mm was later replaced by the current model, the more popular 17-102mm T2.9. Initially, it looked like the new lens was just adding a wide angle conversion lens to the front element of the 20-120mm because the zoom power and the maximum aperture were almost exactly the same. It felt much bulkier and heavier, though.

Surprisingly, it turned out the new lens was optically much better product, together with the precious 3mm wider angle of view and being a current model, it became much more "recognized" by the industry.

To make a long story short, the 20-120mm is a decent lens, good enough to make decent films and would give good representation of your cinematography skills. I am actually pleasently surprised to find its relatively low used price in the market. If you can't afford a RED Zoom or can't wait that long for it, find a good used Angenieux, you can't go wrong, especially if you like the creamy look of the French optics like the 5.3-61mm HD zoom I am currently using.

For the price of a good new still camera zoom, you get a 6:1 quite usable cine style T2.9 lens, what else do you expect?
Click to expand...

Hello AIO,

Saw this lens on Ebay and wondered about it. I know Angenieux use to modify some of their lenses for different uses and think perhaps this is a 6x20 adapted for some other use. Mayby for video cameras with a optical group between the lens and the imaging tubes/chips, I don't know.
Anyhow it does not have a mount on it and if it were to be useable for full or S35 format it could be a real buy as any compenet optical tech could fit it up with a PL mount So if anyone, (Stephen?) is fimiliar with this lens perhaps they could chime in.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...tToStoreCat&refwidgettype=cross_promot_widget

Chuck
 
Beautiful Angeneiux 20-120mm T2.9 HD footage shot in Afghanistan on RED One camera:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRo3u0snnAw

Having just purchased this lens. I am interested in knowing the first release date of these lenses along with any of its history. What is the breathing and ramping like?
 
The clip looked very good. No doubt newer lenses are sharper and have much better color contrast, but these old Angies were the top line premium lenses of their day and are certainly capable of producing beautiful imagery if they are well maintained and in good condition. They will get you 80% of the quality for 5-10% of the price of newer lenses, a decent bargain in my opinion. Whether a new top of the line set of still zooms would be a better choice really depends on shooting style and intended use, but the cine lenses are better by far than most cheap still lenses. A UV filter and circular polarizer along with a proper lens shade or matte box helps with contrast and flare issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top