Zack Birlew
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,462
- Reaction score
- 97
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Website
- www.babsdoproductions.com
Hi, everybody, so I've been looking at the current landscape of anamorphic lenses and wondering about what the current perspective is on investing in vintage sets versus the newer cinema anamorphics from Atlas, Sirui, Laowa, and so many others. In the market the prices go all the way for a few thousand for some LOMO anamorphics and modern 1.33x anamorphics all the way up to the top $100,000+ Zeiss Master Anamorphics, Cooke Anamorphics, and specialty vintage sets like Ultrascopes and Hawks. When we have really nice modern 1.33x, 1.5x, 1.8x, and full on 2x options that are already cinema lens designs, would one really be better served by vintage anamorphics?
I know with spherical lenses there's all kinds of potential differences with various vintage and modern options with some modern options even trying to copy the old vintage lenses they're replacing but with anamorphics, I'm not so sure the mentality is the same as the goal has usually been for the most pristine image in the face of the odd quirks of anamorphic optics. So, what are your thoughts? If you had the money to open a shop or studio and the goal is anamorphics, with all the greats on the table, do you go vintage or modern and why?
I know with spherical lenses there's all kinds of potential differences with various vintage and modern options with some modern options even trying to copy the old vintage lenses they're replacing but with anamorphics, I'm not so sure the mentality is the same as the goal has usually been for the most pristine image in the face of the odd quirks of anamorphic optics. So, what are your thoughts? If you had the money to open a shop or studio and the goal is anamorphics, with all the greats on the table, do you go vintage or modern and why?