Hey all. I posted this over on ScarletUser forums, but they seem fairly dead so I'm reposting here in hopes of getting a clearer answer, since this isn't really a Scarlet-specific question.
I've been doing some research and I think that I want to purchase an S35 Scarlet. However, while looking at digital storage solutions for it that are currently available right now, there are only three options that I can see:
* Red-Drive
* Red-Ram
* CF Card module and CF cards.
Based upon what I have read, it seems that a harddrive solution is really only usable if you plan to have very little motion. While I don't plan to, say, take my Scarlet with me while doing extreme sports, I would like to take motion shots, and don't want to risk dropped frames. CF cards seem relatively expensive, and don't hold very much footage. That leaves Red-Ram. However, Red-Ram costs $4500, which, quite frankly I won't have the budget for after purchasing a Scarlet - even if it's worth that much.
My question is, is the interface between the Red One and the Red-Ram a proprietary one that is not possible to duplicate with other SSDs? (This is assuming that the same interface will be used for Scarlet). Or are there other, more cost-efficient solutions for SSD's with a sustained read/write of 200 MB/s for the purposes of capturing 4k video? I know that they exist out there, but if I buy a SSD by itself, will it be able to interface with the Red One/Scarlet?
I've been doing some research and I think that I want to purchase an S35 Scarlet. However, while looking at digital storage solutions for it that are currently available right now, there are only three options that I can see:
* Red-Drive
* Red-Ram
* CF Card module and CF cards.
Based upon what I have read, it seems that a harddrive solution is really only usable if you plan to have very little motion. While I don't plan to, say, take my Scarlet with me while doing extreme sports, I would like to take motion shots, and don't want to risk dropped frames. CF cards seem relatively expensive, and don't hold very much footage. That leaves Red-Ram. However, Red-Ram costs $4500, which, quite frankly I won't have the budget for after purchasing a Scarlet - even if it's worth that much.
My question is, is the interface between the Red One and the Red-Ram a proprietary one that is not possible to duplicate with other SSDs? (This is assuming that the same interface will be used for Scarlet). Or are there other, more cost-efficient solutions for SSD's with a sustained read/write of 200 MB/s for the purposes of capturing 4k video? I know that they exist out there, but if I buy a SSD by itself, will it be able to interface with the Red One/Scarlet?