Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Adoption of Variable Frame Rate Displays (aka G-SYNC) - benefits for video production

Mark Rejhon

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Some of you may have heard of NVIDIA's G-SYNC, a new variable refresh rate technology that just got announced by NVIDIA:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/ar...evolutionary-ultra-smooth-stutter-free-gaming
It allows software to drive the timing of each refresh, asynchronously. Everytime the graphics card finishes a frame, it's *immediately* displayed on the monitor. No scheduled discrete refresh intervals! Your software decides exactly when to display a frame -- right to the microsecond.

This has great applications for home theater.

Another useful use of variable refresh rate technology (such as G-SYNC), operating at maximum cable bandwidth, is low-latency fixed refresh rate. Since G-SYNC has an additional advantage of faster frame delivery times, and faster on-screen scanout time, you can get 60fps@60Hz with cable delivery of only 1/144sec, and screen scanout of only 1/144sec per refresh! (or whatever maximum bandwidth the G-SYNC monitor uses -- or even theoretical future 240Hz G-SYNC monitors using DisplayPort 2.0, which would be able to do 60fps@60Hz or 77.5fps@77.5Hz or 187fps@187Hz, all with just 1/240th sec frame delivery / scanout latency!) Future G-SYNC monitors could raise the max bandwidth up and up, too, permitting Holodeck-like reality.

In the past, 60Hz monitors took 1/60sec to scanout (16.7ms).
High speed video of CRT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVS6QewZsi4
High speed video of LCD: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCHgmCxGEzY

But with G-SYNC, delivery and scanout is decoupled from the refresh rate. You can choose to do 60fps@60Hz, with a lot less input lag than any 60Hz monitor -- even less input lag than a 60Hz CRT, because CRT's take a finite amount of time to scan from top-to-bottom.

Also, fixed refresh rate is great for G-SYNC too, as the software completely seamlessly drives refresh rate:
- Play movies 24fps@24Hz (or 48Hz, 72Hz, 96Hz)
- Play videos 30fps@30Hz
- Play movies 48fps@48Hz
- Play television 60fps@60Hz
- Play television 59.94Hz@59.94Hz
- Play old silent films at original theater speed 18fps@18Hz (or 36Hz, 72Hz)
- Variable frame rate video files, director chooses their own frame rate.
- Future movie formats (e.g. 72fps, 96fps)
- Play mixed TV material and dynamically detect 24p, 30p, and 60p material, dynamically rate-adapt to new fixed rate (with zero mode-change flicker)
- Play emulators 60fps@60Hz with lower input lag (taking advantage of fast frame delivery times, e.g. 1/144sec with G-SYNC 1.0)
- Clear path to higher frame rates (e.g. NHK 8K 120Hz)
- Interactive applications, future VR, etc.
- Console gaming will benefit hugely, as variable framerates look smooth on variable framerate displays (see why variable-frame rate displays eliminate stutters)
- Videogames at 30Hz will no longer feel laggy
- You can avoid stutters even if one frame takes a bit longer to render (e.g. 16.8ms instead 1/60sec = 16.7ms) for any innocous reason such as processing, background apps or error correction, you just delay that specific refresh by an unnoticeable 0.1 millisecond rather than be forced to wait till next refresh cycle. Makes video playback even smoother.
- etc.

So it has apparently great applications for movies and home theater. Variable refresh rate capability & faster frame delivery time belongs in HDMI 3.0. Less input lag for receivers, less input lag for sports, future game consoles (XBoxTwo, PS5), less broadcasting latency due to speeded-up frame delivery between settop box and TV, less input lag everywhere, future-proof frame rates, faster frame delivery times from one home theater device to another....

Conclusion --
This may be 5 years, 10 years, or maybe until after patents expire, but I think this is an important innovation this century, for TWO very, very major reasons:
1. Faster frame delivery to the display; for less latency even at low frame rates; and
2. Eliminate humankind dependance on discrete refresh rates. One small step towards Holodeck.

Thanks,
Mark Rejhon
Chief Blur Buster
(owner of www.blurbusters.com)
 
Last edited:
Some of you may have heard of NVIDIA's G-SYNC, a new variable refresh rate technology that just got announced by NVIDIA:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/ar...evolutionary-ultra-smooth-stutter-free-gaming
It allows software to drive the timing of each refresh, asynchronously. Everytime the graphics card finishes a frame, it's *immediately* displayed on the monitor. No scheduled discrete refresh intervals! Your software decides exactly when to display a frame -- right to the microsecond.

This has great applications for home theater...

So it has apparently great applications for movies and home theater. Variable refresh rate capability & faster frame delivery time belongs in HDMI 3.0. Less input lag for receivers, less input lag for sports, future game consoles (XBoxTwo, PS5), less broadcasting latency due to speeded-up frame delivery between settop box and TV, less input lag everywhere, future-proof frame rates, faster frame delivery times from one home theater device to another....

Conclusion --
This may be 5 years, 10 years, or maybe until after patents expire, but I think this is an important innovation this century, for TWO very, very major reasons:
1. Faster frame delivery to the display; for less latency even at low frame rates; and
2. Eliminate humankind dependance on discrete refresh rates. One small step towards Holodeck.

Thanks,
Mark Rejhon
Chief Blur Buster
(owner of www.blurbusters.com)


Certainly useful technology I'd love everywhere, BUT the implementation initially will only be available on select 1080p gaming monitors -not even 1440p !

Adding a newer AMD R9 290X GPU, 2nd GPU or 2nd higher resolution screen for most people would provide greater benefit

I find it illogical to spend money on this for 1080p today, because the immediate benefit would be for 4K displays at 60fps or less where Nvidia, AMD and Intel are having a tough time getting gaming at a consistent minimum 60fps at 4K

oh well, at least 24 fps 4K is not going anywhere ...
 
oh well, at least 24 fps 4K is not going anywhere ...

exactly, it's not going anywhere, just staying the same. i'd say it will still be the standard going forward. too many people have adverse reactions to even 30fps. personally, i'm excited about the possibilities of higher framerates but it's probably going to take a generation of experimenting and adapting to get us there. haters gonna hate.
 
Back
Top