Adobe’s Magical 3D Lens

[simonfilm]

Kind of this would be a real innovation and surprise!

http://blog.flowseeker.com/?p=51

 

[dillont]

Holy cow!

This enables some pretty remarkable artistic techniques in post - when people say "We'll fix it in post", it'll have a whole new meaning.:gun:

 

[Ameer Azari]

OH MY GOD!!!!

I bet that's gonna cost a bomb though...

BUT STILL!! OH MY GOD!!

 

[Andrew Hewlett]

WOW. Thats something!

 

[Ameer Azari]

how much do you reckon it'll cost?
and when do you think they'll release it?

 

[David Birdy]

The future has amazing depth of field!

 

[Kreisky]

I call it:"The Insect"
Great Job !
makes sense to me whithout reading a dummie book !
It wont work on the RED ONE (lens has to be much bigger than the Camera),
but I understand why you posted it at Scarlet forum !
Kreisky (RedDummie)

 

[Rudi Herbert]

I bet this is the "game changer" that Mark from Ofhollywood was talking about...

 

[Michael Schrengohst]

Here is some more info:
Just Imagine this on a RED,
fix exposure and focus in post!

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/3d-magic...-and-software-[updated-with-video]-308659.php

 

[dillont]

Computational Photography!

 

[Steve Freebairn]

Count me in for buying one of those (given it's not too much). It seems like you'd need a 200 megapixel sensor if you were going to split it 50 different ways.

 

[jbeale]

It's been a research topic for some time- looking forward to seeing some practical cameras come out of it! For some background, see: http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lightfield/

 

[Frank Weeks]

Wow. That is interesting!

 

[Andrew McCarrick]

My question would be are you losing resolution per image? Those various angles have to be stored somewhere.... you can't stack a bunch of angles on one pixel.

 

[John Godden]

This is just vaporware. Come back in 4+ years when you have something solid.

JohnG

 

[Michele Gavazzeni]

Brilliant !!!!!!!

 

[Eugene]

This is old news. I read about it a year or so ago.
A moderator needs to move this to the Off Topic section. :angry03:

 

[Antoine Fabi]

Ouch !!!!!

Fantastic if they can get good optical quality out of it.

 

[David Birdy]

Great post Thanks Simon!

 

[Kevin Lang]

Holy !@#! That is cool as hell! I must have one.