Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

A box with a hole and a sensor

BrandonRice

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
The Middle West
Website
www.i-o-i-o.com
Dear Jim,

Now that you've got the professional market cornered is there any chance you could hit the semi-professional market?

I'd be happy with a box with a hole and a full frame sensor. High res still images and 2k video. Box with a hole. That's all I want. point it, expose it, and shoot.

Okay maybe a lens mount too... A box with a hole. A lens mount. High res still images. and 2k video. That's all I want. Oh and make it under $2,000 plz. That's about all I want.

Is it possible?

Sincerely,
Brandon
 
Dear Jim,

Now that you've got the professional market cornered is there any chance you could hit the semi-professional market?

I'd be happy with a box with a hole and a full frame sensor. High res still images and 2k video. Box with a hole. That's all I want. point it, expose it, and shoot.

Okay maybe a lens mount too... A box with a hole. A lens mount. High res still images. and 2k video. That's all I want. Oh and make it under $2,000 plz. That's about all I want.

Is it possible?

Sincerely,
Brandon

And how are you going to operate this camera without it doing an internal debayering & downconversion in real time to RGB for a monitor or EVF, probably to 720P or 1080P? How are you going to record this 2K uncompressed RAW output on your own if your budget is just $2000 for the camera? Once you start tossing in simple things like that -- real-time debayering / RGB outputs, and recording options, it isn't just a box with a sensor anymore.

Even a simple camera needs a way of framing up the shots and a way of recording the shots.
 
I imagine you won't see any camera like that for $2,000 for 3-5 years. You may want to look at the Sony NEX-VG10. 1920x1080 is not far from 2K (it's 1.92K). It has a single large sensor 16x the size of a 1/3" imager and includes a lens mount. It's available at B&H for $1,998


Dear Jim,

Now that you've got the professional market cornered is there any chance you could hit the semi-professional market?

I'd be happy with a box with a hole and a full frame sensor. High res still images and 2k video. Box with a hole. That's all I want. point it, expose it, and shoot.

Okay maybe a lens mount too... A box with a hole. A lens mount. High res still images. and 2k video. That's all I want. Oh and make it under $2,000 plz. That's about all I want.

Is it possible?

Sincerely,
Brandon
 
————————————
Well I'm gonna go then. And I don't need any of this. I don't need this stuff, and I don't need you. I don't need anything except this.
[picks up an ashtray]
And that's it and that's the only thing I need, is this. I don't need this or this. Just this ashtray. And this paddle game, the ashtray and the paddle game and that's all I need. And this remote control. The ashtray, the paddle game, and the remote control, and that's all I need. And these matches. The ashtray, and these matches, and the remote control and the paddle ball. And this lamp. The ashtray, this paddle game and the remote control and the lamp and that's all I need. And that's all I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one — I need this. The paddle game, and the chair, and the remote control, and the matches, for sure. And this. And that's all I need. The ashtray, the remote control, the paddle game, this magazine and the chair.
[walking outside]
And I don't need one other thing, except my dog.
[dog growls]
I don't need my dog.
————————————
 
the prosummer market is tapped by canon, panasonic, jvc... so on..

a company diving into prosummer world has a whole bunch of future issues..

customers that may not treat gear the same = more repairs/warrenty issues.. and it will overall slow down the professional concentration.

Id rather RED be dedicated to servicing and manufacturing for the pro world..rather than have a hand in a different cookie jar
 
————————————
Well I'm gonna go then. And I don't need any of this. I don't need this stuff, and I don't need you. I don't need anything except this.
[picks up an ashtray]
And that's it and that's the only thing I need, is this. I don't need this or this. Just this ashtray. And this paddle game, the ashtray and the paddle game and that's all I need. And this remote control. The ashtray, the paddle game, and the remote control, and that's all I need. And these matches. The ashtray, and these matches, and the remote control and the paddle ball. And this lamp. The ashtray, this paddle game and the remote control and the lamp and that's all I need. And that's all I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one — I need this. The paddle game, and the chair, and the remote control, and the matches, for sure. And this. And that's all I need. The ashtray, the remote control, the paddle game, this magazine and the chair.
[walking outside]
And I don't need one other thing, except my dog.
[dog growls]
I don't need my dog.
————————————

Sometimes I wish reduser had a thumbs up or favorites button.
This is one of those times.

Also, a $2000 RED camera will be available at some point down the road. It's called a second hand Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable.
 
Jim has said a lot of times that RED is a 4K and beyond company and dedicated to creating tools for the creative professionals. Even if he does change his mind, I don't see this happening any time soon.
 
It's a legitimate question but I was just pointing out that it takes more than a box and a sensor and a lens to shoot digital movies, at minimum you need a viewfinder and a recorder. And if you are recording uncompressed 2K RAW data at 24 fps, well, that's a bucketload of data (someone can do the math) -- and you also need a way of transcoding that footage into RGB later in post. Not to mention you need to back-up the data.

So if you want a color image in a viewfinder, you need to debayer internally in real time, and if you want to compress the data to manageable levels, you need a processor for that, all of which involves more than a sensor in a box. So it's not that you couldn't just build a 2K sensor in a box, maybe even for $2000, it's just that leaving the rest up to the buyer would drive-up the cost -- not just the cost of the lens, but the cost of an EVF, the cost of a data recorder, the cost of recording media, etc. You could be well-over $10,000 before you even come close to having something production friendly.

Most people who want a $2000 movie camera want it to be ready to shoot and record -- if they had another $10,000 for all the add-ons, they probably would be looking at a more sophisticated camera in the first place.
 
Also, a $2000 RED camera will be available at some point down the road. It's called a second hand Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable.

...and that will be the day I finally own a camera built by Red. :thumbup1:
 
And how are you going to operate this camera without it doing an internal debayering & downconversion in real time to RGB for a monitor or EVF, probably to 720P or 1080P? How are you going to record this 2K uncompressed RAW output on your own if your budget is just $2000 for the camera? Once you start tossing in simple things like that -- real-time debayering / RGB outputs, and recording options, it isn't just a box with a sensor anymore.

Even a simple camera needs a way of framing up the shots and a way of recording the shots.

What about a sports finder like the speed graphic? Probably would not add much more than 10 bucks to the box. Very simple.
 
What about a sports finder like the speed graphic? Probably would not add much more than 10 bucks to the box. Very simple.

In this day and age of the zoom lens, most people need to see exacting what the taking lens is seeing. The only modern cameras where a viewfinder is less necessary are things like the GoPro, which has a super wide-angle lens on it, and it's generally used to shoot fast action, not carefully compose a shot.
 
In this day and age of the zoom lens, most people need to see exacting what the taking lens is seeing. The only modern cameras where a viewfinder is less necessary are things like the GoPro, which has a super wide-angle lens on it, and it's generally used to shoot fast action, not carefully compose a shot.

Perhaps something along the lines of one of these would suit the 2k box? It would correct for parallax and focal length. And like a film camera there would be a latent image until you processed the data.
 

Attachments

  • adjustable view finder.jpg
    adjustable view finder.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top