Joseph Coleman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2010
- Messages
- 413
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Detroit, MI
- Website
- www.mediacoleman.com
I'm working on visual effects for a movie that was shot Anamorphic 2:1. Our delivery format is 2k 2048 by 1556.
My question is...In the era of digital projection are anamorphic films still projected through an anamorphic lens to achieve the proper frame aspect ratio or does the final DCP just scale the image down to 2048 by 858 and then project through a typical spherical lens?
The reason why I ask is we caught one of out vendors rendering the visual effects at 2048 by 778 and scaling the image up to delivery format rather than rendering at 2048 by 1556 at 2:1 pixel aspect ratio. So, my second question is, is that standard practice for visual effects on anamorphic films?
I can see that being ok if the final DCP is scaled down. But I've always seen one of the benefits of shooting Anamorphic is the increased resolution.
My question is...In the era of digital projection are anamorphic films still projected through an anamorphic lens to achieve the proper frame aspect ratio or does the final DCP just scale the image down to 2048 by 858 and then project through a typical spherical lens?
The reason why I ask is we caught one of out vendors rendering the visual effects at 2048 by 778 and scaling the image up to delivery format rather than rendering at 2048 by 1556 at 2:1 pixel aspect ratio. So, my second question is, is that standard practice for visual effects on anamorphic films?
I can see that being ok if the final DCP is scaled down. But I've always seen one of the benefits of shooting Anamorphic is the increased resolution.