Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

David Mullen's "Jennifer's Body"

Jonathan Stevenson

Jonathan Stevenson

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Denver
I'm very excited about this flick and proud to hear that our own superstar was behind the camera on this one! Can't wait to see more stills...

http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/would-you-like-to-see-more-of-jennifers-body.php

From IMDB:

"Camera
Panavision Cameras, Primo Lenses
Phantom HD Camera

Laboratory
Technicolor, Vancouver, Canada

Film negative format (mm/video inches)
35 mm (Kodak Vision2 100T 5212, Vision2 200T 5217, Vision3 500T 5219)
Video (HDTV)

Cinematographic process
Digital Intermediate (master format)
HDTV (source format)
Super 35 (3-perf) (source format)

Printed film format
35 mm (spherical)

Aspect ratio
1.85 : 1"
 
Thanks for the link.
 
Abel Cine Tech was proud to provide David with the Phantom HD for the climactic ending to Jennifer's Body.
 
Yeah that was my bad. I meant to put it under Cinematography and must've messed up somewhere.
 
Thanks for moving! I, for one, am very excited for the flick. Diablo Cody is a fav of mine.
 
And David is a fav of mine!
 
I like the '80s horror era vibe they went for with the poster...

could be a fun movie...
 
I may be wrong, but I think David is a favorite of all of us reduser nerds... no matter what thread his work is attached to... although you guys are right, and it should be where it belongs. I like the Abel marketing
 
Is there going to be a big LA premiere or anything?
 
Chris Collins said:
I like the Abel marketing
Click to expand...

Thanks, I do my best.:devil:

Hey, I didn't start the thread and David & I have been friendly long before RED and before I was with Abel, maybe 15 years or so.
 
David Mullen ASC said:
I guess, it's not like I'm kept in the loop about such things.
Click to expand...

Heh. Tell the producers you are coming, and bringing along 200 of your internet disciples. :seeya:

You'll have a bigger posse than 50 Cent.
 
So, is this the movie with the flavor-of-the-month "actress" Megan Fox, written by Diablo Cody?
 
David,

If you could. Given that Fox has quickly become sort of the current sex symbol of the screen, when shooting someone like that, were you asked to light/shoot her in a way that favors her physical traits or were you just doing the same work you'd do for any other actress, given her individual features and whatever the scenes call for?
 
I followed the needs of the script - she's supposed to be "the hottest girl in school" but in a realistic way... but once the story's main incident kicks in, she's supposed to alternate between being insanely hot (for supernatural reasons) and looking worn-out and "blah" (for the same reasons). So there were a number of levels of looks in her make-up depending on the story point. I suppose the trickier part was making her look down.

The problem wasn't with Megan's character, it was with Amanda Seyfried, the other main character. I've worked with Amanda twice before this movie, and she's gorgeous. But her character is supposed to be the school nerd. Her character's name is "Needy" and she's described in the script as being owlish and wearing eyeglasses. But the studio was pretty dead set against making her look too nerdy. We had lots of discussions over the eyeglasses, they really didn't even want that, but without some touch of bookishness, instead of a story about the unlikely friendship of the hot cheerleader and the nerd, it was a story about a hot brunette and a hot blonde (which would have suited many people just fine.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top