Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Profile: SC 4.1 250ISO

Cüneyt Kaya said:
i dscovered that lowering just the exposure -0.4 in the RED solves that Problem too.

btwl
i cant exactly remeber but graeme or stuart was talking about something with -0.4 exposure
Click to expand...


Wait. I think you are mixing two different things here:

- the sensitivity setting in camera doesn´t match the ISO system for film speed which is the measure of a photographic film's sensitivity to light.

- bringing down exposure to -0.4 from the "native" 320ISO will recover about 1/3 of a hidden stop.
 
Cüneyt Kaya said:
sorry...had to watch twice to the pic.

the comment of yours and friends are entertaining and refreshing for me.
i just dont want to see sanjins posts anymore.
Click to expand...
could sj apologize himself?.. maybe a personal problem.. we all (you dave too on your own old way) try to help.. it has been a sad entertainment.. there's an old saying which says.. by the mouth the fish dies.. change the mouth for the keyboard.. the fish for the mouse.. w/ an add-on.. they are more than one.. you/we'll have our answers.. ignore lists not aside.

the people should put their own emotions only on private mode.. the sober mac is a good example.

Cüneyt Kaya said:
@Cristina:
so why do you post another useless sentence in this thread :)
Click to expand...
:beer:

it's all yours mac.. let's hope :)
 
TedRed said:
– one camera for low contrast...photography where you can rate from 250 ASA on down as long as you don’t overexpose, and use the Raw View mode in the camera to check the levels....

... and one camera for high contrast...photography...you can expose at 400 ASA or higher, and as long as you don’t clip the highlights, you will be amazed at how much range you have in the mids and shadows to work with...
Click to expand...

can you please explain WHY the red works this way.

why rate in low con from 250
why rate in high con at 400 or higher.

why does the red behave like that?

i like to hear an explanation
 
Cüneyt Kaya said:
can you please explain WHY the red works this way.

why rate in low con from 250
why rate in high con at 400 or higher.

why does the red behave like that?

i like to hear an explanation
Click to expand...

Mainly because the ASA/ISO rating assumes a film negative exposure curve, which is not how digital sensors work.
 
Mac: Could you explain a little more about this image, and how it was taken:

image0.jpg


Was there a bounce card to fill in on her face? How did the profile change the exposure exactly? Could you have done the same thing without the profile, or would the face appear too dark on the monitor? What significance does this profile have in shooting these types of images?
 
I am getting digital gibberish when I click the profile link.

I guess it is just a safari thing. Fine in Firefox.
 
'Never a rose without the prick' 4

'Never a rose without the prick' 4

Don't forget that you cannot battle with me just because you don't EVEN KNOW and cannot IMAGINE know how BIG I am!!!! Ha , ha , he , he,...

Profile: SC 4.1 250ISO (VIRUS) is getting in a wrong highhway and then being soon dangerous because NOBODY KNOWS how it is done on R1

and IF I WANT TO SEE SOME A REALLY GOOD PRETTY GIRLS shot on R1 I CALL a photo professional like a Greg Williiams and he can do it for me, I don't need amateurs...:

http://www.gregfoto.com

that also shot a 'sequence'.

All other options are foggy and pretty a bit artistic blurry as we know that well...

Hi, F.M., guys, all is "hilarious", isn't it?

A002_C009_1030U0_H.JPG

Shot on RED1 with (a vintage, 73 years old lens design) Zeiss Sonnar 180mm F/2.8 Olympia (1936) @ f/8, Circ-Pola & ND 0.6, 1/50 shutter, 25 fps,...

A001_C009_0402UM_H.jpg

Shot on RED1 with (a vintage, 73 years old lens design) Zeiss Sonnar 180mm F/2.8 Olympia (1936) @ f/8, Circ-Pola & ND 0.6, 1/50 shutter, 25 fps,...

Ha, ha, he, he,...:rofl:

WE DON'T NEED KNOW A CAMERA THAT RATED AT 250 ISO,

WE HONESTLY AND DESPERATELY NEED 320 ISO RATING OR AS A STARTING POINT, ISN'T IT?....

YOU, ALL YOU BLOODY M.F!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:dupe:
 
Sanjin Jukic said:
:rofl:
Click to expand...

Actually the funniest part of this thread is you calling Macgregor an amateur.

Thanks for sharing this Macgregor. Whether people find it useful or not, it's very generous of you to share your work.
 
Dominic Cochran said:
Actually the funniest part of this thread is you calling Macgregor an amateur.
Click to expand...

Ha, ha, ... :rofl::rofl:

Thousands of the same or more talented shooters will "knocK" a doors of "heaven" in the following months when RED is going to deliver a huge volume of "high resolution" 4K/5K cameras.

Simply I will "call" the first people like a Greg Williams that would not offer me any RED1 profile or similar guys, hope you would get it now finally what does it mean,...

Welcome!!!
 
Jay A. Kelley said:
Mac are you posting a "look" file or a profile? They are different.

Jay
Click to expand...

He posted a .RLK file which is a look file

The other file you can load into the Red is a .RPF which is your user preferences file...this is not the same.
 
Jay A. Kelley said:
Sanjin,

What's wrong with you man?
Click to expand...

Nothing at all!

Except:

I think that a lot of people get wrong in a way of dealing with RED1 especially at the (rich) "provinces" of Europe, USA, or,...

like I'm living (Vienna, Austria, EU,...) where the producers don't want to put their money renting something (digital) camera

that have 250 ISO (proposed in "Profile: SC 4.1 250ISO" rating sensitivity because they work for years with HD video or 16mm film without (any?) of that problems.

For example an Austrian film at Cannes 2009 is shot with 16mm film (/schade/),

an Austrian film production is almost always an independent and struggle with money,...

so my dear friend Jay A. Kelley,

people like "M.G" is a somehow VERY serious "danger" or a bit "dumper" of the RED1 system that I would like to work/rent/borrow or whatever right now or in the future..

Hope you would understand the facts...

nothing personal...

except when things start to get serious like to use/abuse "some pretty girls shootings" for a purpose of gain of... (sorry to tell it here) "unsuccessful" author/cinematographer...

Metaphorically speaking watch (my) flowers (a little "pricks") from (my) balcony in those following days... more to come... stay tuned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top