Chris Parker
REDuser Sponsor
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
- Messages
- 1,932
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Adobe has now done (and will continue to modify) what needed doing. Unfortunately, not many people use their editing software. Yet. It sure is good to see a rep from Adobe on this forum.
Where's everyone else? Well, MichaelIP has been a great member here for a long while and we know AVID is always working hard to improve their RED workflow. Are you guys planning on going native with .r3d Michael? Sure would be nice.
And Apple, well they have been silent since they had the keys to the castle handed to them from RED at the get-go. I still expect BIG things from Final Cut Studio 3.0. Like full native .r3d support (not fake native as it is now), from Final Cut to Color and back again. If they don't do this (or buy ADOBE) then Final Cut is doomed. I think they will step up though, but lately my confidence in this sector of Apple is diminishing. Apple, where are you? Are you here? Are you listening to us? Do you truly only care about phones and iPods now? Do you not see how Final Cut Studio drives your hardware sales to some degree?
And what about the color software companies? Is Scratch going to remain the only native game in town, or are the Baselights, Pablos, etc. etc. going to offer native .r3d colorizing in the near future?
And my biggest question to ALL of you is this....can you keep up to RED? And RED, are you going to freely distribute the necessary tools to EVERYONE so that they can all keep up? Would be nice if when working in any application, we can just select the REDCode format that the master was shot on, be it REDCode 28, 36, 225, or whatever, and begin working natively. Adobe sure has hit the nail on the head. Work natively, one-click to bump down resolution for quick work. One-click to bump up resolution for fine work. All native. That is the ticket, and I want to know who else is going to offer this....I can't believe as big as RED is in our industry now that ALL companies don't have a 'MichaelIP' or a 'Mitch Gross' dedicated to this forum.
Where's everyone else? Well, MichaelIP has been a great member here for a long while and we know AVID is always working hard to improve their RED workflow. Are you guys planning on going native with .r3d Michael? Sure would be nice.
And Apple, well they have been silent since they had the keys to the castle handed to them from RED at the get-go. I still expect BIG things from Final Cut Studio 3.0. Like full native .r3d support (not fake native as it is now), from Final Cut to Color and back again. If they don't do this (or buy ADOBE) then Final Cut is doomed. I think they will step up though, but lately my confidence in this sector of Apple is diminishing. Apple, where are you? Are you here? Are you listening to us? Do you truly only care about phones and iPods now? Do you not see how Final Cut Studio drives your hardware sales to some degree?
And what about the color software companies? Is Scratch going to remain the only native game in town, or are the Baselights, Pablos, etc. etc. going to offer native .r3d colorizing in the near future?
And my biggest question to ALL of you is this....can you keep up to RED? And RED, are you going to freely distribute the necessary tools to EVERYONE so that they can all keep up? Would be nice if when working in any application, we can just select the REDCode format that the master was shot on, be it REDCode 28, 36, 225, or whatever, and begin working natively. Adobe sure has hit the nail on the head. Work natively, one-click to bump down resolution for quick work. One-click to bump up resolution for fine work. All native. That is the ticket, and I want to know who else is going to offer this....I can't believe as big as RED is in our industry now that ALL companies don't have a 'MichaelIP' or a 'Mitch Gross' dedicated to this forum.