Casey Green
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 2,101
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.redcamcentral.com
Casey Green said:can you elaborate on what was done to improve the board (without the need of a daughter board) ?
I haven't noticed Jim ever specifying much detail about camera internals. But, since I'm sure you'd just as soon have my uninformed speculation...![]()
Suppose you are making a camera and one day hear of a bright shiny new circuit component(s) with improved specs that would improve your camera, but the pinout is different than the part you use now. Then it is not a "drop in replacement" because the pins can't be soldered to the existing circuit board. But if you really want the new part anyway, one option is to make a so-called daughterboard to hold the new part(s) and that is in turn soldered in place of the old part(s) on the original mainboard (or via connectors etc.) But then late some evening, the guys in back have a moment of extreme cleverness and see where if you rotate it slightly you actually can solder down the part, just a few pins are swapped and you can do a quick cut & jumper, or maybe you are real lucky and it's digital logic so you can actually flip a register in the FPGA and make it right without the roach wires... well you get the idea.
Sorry for the above longwinded speculation/fantasy. It's just a "for-example" idea; one way this type of thing could have played out.
interesting theory...
Jim, can you tell us how this actually played out?