- Banned
- #21
Gbabymogul
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Messages
- 192
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Not really (IMO). If they do it right, it should be akin to a film camera. It should hold its value for a long time. Similarly, you could compare the improvement in film stocks (with film cameras) to improvement in sensor tech (with digital cinema). One of the reasons that film triumphed is that the emulsions improved exponentially while having an entire base paradigm that didn't have to with each iteration and improvement.I can't really understand why there would be a need to upgrade the sensor to be honest, any upgrade in the NEAR future would be an admition of the current sensor being inadequate in some form surely? And any upgrade after a number of years might just as well have a new body to go with it with all the benefits of other modern technology...
Sure, there'll be body redesigns and other changes , but they don't need to be complete redesigns, and the pace of change doesn't need to be concurrent with sensor technology to take advantage of the field. And in any case, I doubt sensor upgrades will be a yearly event.
BTW, every sensor can be improved. That's just science
If the next set of footage from Spike (high contrast, motion, deep DOF etc...) is as good as the current footy ; you'll see how modularity will entrench a technology, and not do the opposite.