Ivan Kovax
Well-known member
Quick question for you all:
Having worked in Japan for the past 6 years I discovered something new. The DIT douchebag.
For the first time in my life I recently encountered a DIT from the USA with an arrogant attitude. He acted like he was the most important person on set other than the DP and Director, and clearly made no effort to hide his love of himself from anybody.
This didn't bother me at all as I have minimal involvement with this project, but I snuk a chat to the 1st AC (also American) before I left the shoot, and he mentioned to me that apparently quite a lot of DITs in the States carry this sanctimonious attitude.
What made is worse was that he was in his early 20s, and that he was being paid over 1K/day, to do a rather average job and sit around all day pretending like he is busy and taking 3 times longer than everybody else to get anything done. For starters... why the hell are they getting as much as cameramen? And secondly, what makes them think they are so damned important? It is a purely technical job that has minimal creative impact other than "not screwing up" data backup, QC and making sure the same looking lut is applied to all shots and transcodes. The scopes were bullshit and purely for show, as he has never used them once. 1K per day is far in excess of what any DIT should be getting in salary alone... it is an important technical position but more akin to a technical version of camera assistant then next in line to the emperor. I would suggest that the focus puller's position is far more critical to the shoot than the DITs. As long as the DIT can click copy, bit check (amongst other things) and get the transcodes right...
And before anybody rants about, let me say that I know exactly what a DIT does, as I have also done the job several hundred times... and I have had some pretty major clients too.
So... explain! thanks
END
Having worked in Japan for the past 6 years I discovered something new. The DIT douchebag.
For the first time in my life I recently encountered a DIT from the USA with an arrogant attitude. He acted like he was the most important person on set other than the DP and Director, and clearly made no effort to hide his love of himself from anybody.
This didn't bother me at all as I have minimal involvement with this project, but I snuk a chat to the 1st AC (also American) before I left the shoot, and he mentioned to me that apparently quite a lot of DITs in the States carry this sanctimonious attitude.
What made is worse was that he was in his early 20s, and that he was being paid over 1K/day, to do a rather average job and sit around all day pretending like he is busy and taking 3 times longer than everybody else to get anything done. For starters... why the hell are they getting as much as cameramen? And secondly, what makes them think they are so damned important? It is a purely technical job that has minimal creative impact other than "not screwing up" data backup, QC and making sure the same looking lut is applied to all shots and transcodes. The scopes were bullshit and purely for show, as he has never used them once. 1K per day is far in excess of what any DIT should be getting in salary alone... it is an important technical position but more akin to a technical version of camera assistant then next in line to the emperor. I would suggest that the focus puller's position is far more critical to the shoot than the DITs. As long as the DIT can click copy, bit check (amongst other things) and get the transcodes right...
And before anybody rants about, let me say that I know exactly what a DIT does, as I have also done the job several hundred times... and I have had some pretty major clients too.
So... explain! thanks
END
Last edited: