Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Not at all sir. Very clear thinking IMHO.It seems like the basic strategy for motion with the Scarlet-X will be to shoot at 4k whenever you do not need slow motion or HDRx and then drop down to 3k whenever you need to use one of those things. That should be more than fine as long as you're going out to 2k. The Scarlet-X really seems like a 2k output A-camera/4k output B-camera (for coverage where HDRx and slow motion are not needed) that can also shoot stills on the same level as Epic.
I suppose for work where you are totally confident that you will not make use of slow motion or HDRx it works fine as a 4k-output A-camera as well. You could also opt to use it as the workhorse A-camera on a project that goes out to 4k, but rent an Epic for the few days where you need slow motion or HDRx for certain shots.
Am I misunderstanding anything?
It seems like the basic strategy for motion with the Scarlet-X will be to shoot at 4k whenever you do not need slow motion or HDRx and then drop down to 3k whenever you need to use one of those things. That should be more than fine as long as you're going out to 2k. The Scarlet-X really seems like a 2k output A-camera/4k output B-camera (for coverage where HDRx and slow motion are not needed) that can also shoot stills on the same level as Epic.
I suppose for work where you are totally confident that you will not make use of slow motion or HDRx it works fine as a 4k-output A-camera as well. You could also opt to use it as the workhorse A-camera on a project that goes out to 4k, but rent an Epic for the few days where you need slow motion or HDRx for certain shots.
Am I misunderstanding anything?
I think this would honestly take the Scarlet from an incredible, unprecedented value on some pretty revolutionary equipment to a borderline "must buy" piece of kit for professionals with the necessary funds.One thing to note is that Jarred said on ScarletUser that they are looking into the possibility of recording 4k HDRx @ 24p with higher compression. So we might yet see 48p 4k.
Well something else to keep in mind is that Dragon will probably make HDRx mostly pointless.![]()
Why is that?
![]()
This chart will answer all your questions. HDRx is there across the board but it can only muster up 25 fps at 3K. That is now, anyway. In the future there should be a firmware upgrade with modified compression that will enable 24/25 fps HDRx at 4K.
I think he meant because the dynamic range of the sensor will probably be pretty impressive leaving HDRx as a feature not many would use. Although if that is the case, then HDRx will be so impresisve with the Dragon sensor. Although not going to lie, I don't think Dragon will be so impressive that it will make us question whether or not we need HDRx.