Frank Cueto
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 729
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 48
- Location
- San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Website
- www.reaktorpost.com
I have a couple doubts, from a Post/VFX/CGI point of view.
Many years have been spent trying to get accurate simulations of motion blur and related visual artifacts. Does this new way of seeing motion affect us compositors/vfx guys?
I keep looking at the Vegas shot of the fire truck, and keep thinking that if had to do some kind of work on that shot it would be a nightmare matching the look. Not only that, the look would change depending on the settings that they put on the camera.
I know a solution... work both streams independently and then remix em.. yeah, right... double the work, and for sure not double the pay (and who can guarantee we get the tools for a proper mix of streams?).
Thats just for comping, lets not even get started with 3D (as in CGI).
Or how about a stereo show with cgi + HDRx™ + Stereo? Does this imply 4 streams of footage????
You can see where I am going with this...
Many years have been spent trying to get accurate simulations of motion blur and related visual artifacts. Does this new way of seeing motion affect us compositors/vfx guys?
I keep looking at the Vegas shot of the fire truck, and keep thinking that if had to do some kind of work on that shot it would be a nightmare matching the look. Not only that, the look would change depending on the settings that they put on the camera.
I know a solution... work both streams independently and then remix em.. yeah, right... double the work, and for sure not double the pay (and who can guarantee we get the tools for a proper mix of streams?).
Thats just for comping, lets not even get started with 3D (as in CGI).
Or how about a stereo show with cgi + HDRx™ + Stereo? Does this imply 4 streams of footage????
You can see where I am going with this...