I bet the 5d cant do this.

[Mark Toia]

I bet the 5d cant do this (in video mode) but of corse it can in RAW stills.
but then again, it is only $1500



http://www.reduser.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3792&stc=1&d=1259714007
http://reduser.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3793&d=1259714105

I think this is really why I love RED. Even if you stuff up your exposure you can still save it.

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

it's so called a HEAD ROOM...or a similar...

 

[XiaoSu Han]

And I bet with Vision 3 you can go 4 stops over that and still get detail back.

Funny how people still keep comparing 5D with RED with 35mm. Horses for courses!

 

[Ryan Valle]

haha, of course if one makes those mistakes on a real world shoot, it makes me wonder, "should one be using the camera?"

of course, the key word here is mistake. somebody that knows what they're doing might over or underexpose for a stylistic approach of a shot.

but yeah, once other camera manufacturers and get to their senses with doing video with raw capabilities, then this world will start to get more competitive gear.

 

[Pietro Impagliazzo]

Horses for courses!

Tom is gonna haunt you at night with his combed hair avatar!

 

[Mark Toia]

After shooting 35mm for 15 years+ (and still shooting it) I can categorically say no you cannot get a nice image out of Vision 3 when its 4 stops over. Neither can you get that with RED.

And I bet with Vision 3 you can go 4 stops over that and still get detail back.

Funny how people still keep comparing 5D with RED with 35mm. Horses for courses!

 

[Mark Toia]

haha, of course if one makes those mistakes on a real world shoot, it makes me wonder, "should one be using the camera?"

of course, the key word here is mistake. somebody that knows what they're doing might over or underexpose for a stylistic approach of a shot.

but yeah, once other camera manufacturers and get to their senses with doing video with raw capabilities, then this world will start to get more competitive gear.

Agreed.