Drew Suppa
Well-known member
Hey all:
In October, I was brought back to my college town of Orlando, Florida to shoot a film for first-time director Kevin Dietrich. Kevin, a cousin of my friend Joe from film school, has long had a passion for the film industry and began producing for his cousin when we both attended UCF. An accident years ago left Kevin a quadriplegic, but his determination and drive shone through like no one I've ever met.
The short was shot with Build 21 (Beta) in 4.5K utilizing RED's own 17-85mm T2.9 zoom and a variety of accessories from third-party companies available as part of IndieRentals' "Ultimate Package" out of Los Angeles.
I'd love to discuss the positive and negative attributes with both RED hardware utilized and this Beta Build.
I've followed RED from it's public announcement and was proud to be at "The Lot" two years ago for it's official unveiling. I also had the pleasure of meeting Jim Jannard there. I've always been fairly pleased with the RED One body, but this production was my first time using RED lenses; on past productions, I'd stuck with Zeiss, Arri, Angenieux or even Panavision glass.
The 17-85mm T2.9 was chosen because the rental house's Optimo 18-85mm had been stolen two weeks prior to checkout. I did a lens test in-house and was pleased with the glass and attributes of the RED zoom. I was actually very surprised with the quality of glass and sharpness, as well as weight and over-all feel. Recessed witness marks seemed to be the biggest complaint from the lens, until an issue arose half-way through production... I'll explain momentarily.
My Gaffer recommended to me a Key Grip out of Florida; a few phone calls later, I was able to secure his services and his 10-Ton package. The light loss from the Optimo T2.2 to the RED T2.9 was noticeable, but between the G&E package and Build 21's processing, I was confident what I aimed to create would be possible.
I'll continue soon, but does anyone know where I can host larger files so you can see the 2K .tiff files?
In October, I was brought back to my college town of Orlando, Florida to shoot a film for first-time director Kevin Dietrich. Kevin, a cousin of my friend Joe from film school, has long had a passion for the film industry and began producing for his cousin when we both attended UCF. An accident years ago left Kevin a quadriplegic, but his determination and drive shone through like no one I've ever met.
The short was shot with Build 21 (Beta) in 4.5K utilizing RED's own 17-85mm T2.9 zoom and a variety of accessories from third-party companies available as part of IndieRentals' "Ultimate Package" out of Los Angeles.
I'd love to discuss the positive and negative attributes with both RED hardware utilized and this Beta Build.
I've followed RED from it's public announcement and was proud to be at "The Lot" two years ago for it's official unveiling. I also had the pleasure of meeting Jim Jannard there. I've always been fairly pleased with the RED One body, but this production was my first time using RED lenses; on past productions, I'd stuck with Zeiss, Arri, Angenieux or even Panavision glass.
The 17-85mm T2.9 was chosen because the rental house's Optimo 18-85mm had been stolen two weeks prior to checkout. I did a lens test in-house and was pleased with the glass and attributes of the RED zoom. I was actually very surprised with the quality of glass and sharpness, as well as weight and over-all feel. Recessed witness marks seemed to be the biggest complaint from the lens, until an issue arose half-way through production... I'll explain momentarily.
My Gaffer recommended to me a Key Grip out of Florida; a few phone calls later, I was able to secure his services and his 10-Ton package. The light loss from the Optimo T2.2 to the RED T2.9 was noticeable, but between the G&E package and Build 21's processing, I was confident what I aimed to create would be possible.
I'll continue soon, but does anyone know where I can host larger files so you can see the 2K .tiff files?