Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

What is the difference between 4K HD and 4K 2:1?

Stephen Pruitt

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
3,309
Reaction score
40
Points
48
Website
www.thetreemotionpicture.com
We typically shoot 4K 2:1, but with the newer builds, 4K HD is available. What is the difference between them?

Stephen
 
HD is 16:9 ratio, but the resolution is exactly 2x 1920 by 1080. So, its 3840 x 2160. This allows you to use the _H proxies and have a precisely 1080p timeline without scaling, plus it is supposed to render out more quickly to HD. Resolution equivalent to 8.294 Megapixels

2:1 is 4096 x 2048. 8.388 Megapixels.

I usually shoot everything in 16:9 unless I know we will be cutting in with other 1080p footage, when I shoot 4KHD.

4K 16:9 is 9.437 Megapixels, so you "gain" over 1 mp of data.
 
4K HD is ideal for projects finishing on TV- such as 1080 or 720p HD because it reduces to 1920x1080 quickly and with no cropping.

-Noah
 
Well, then we have a redundancy, right?

My camera (Build 17) clearly has three 4K settings:

4K HD

4K 2:1

4K 16x9

So, what's the difference between 4K HD and 4K 16x9?

Stephen
 
Stacey's dead right, but to expand on it a little, both modes are the same ratio, with 4KHD taking a slight center-crop from the chip to give pixel dimensions that are exactly double 1080p in both directions, yielding an image exactly four times the area.

This makes be-bayering and scaling to 1080p significantly faster, and also slightly higher in quality and therefore better than 4K 16:9 for output that is intended primarily for 1080p distribution - but comes at the loss of a slight bit of FoV from your lenses and the ability to re-frame (whilst keeping said advantages - you obviously still have tons of room to re-frame, but then you lose the speed and quality boosts as you are no longer at exactly 4xHD).

Incidentally, I think it would make more sense for the mode to be called 4xHD rather than 4KHD, but there you go...

Dom.
 
How much faster is it to render 4KHD to 1920x1080 on a quad-core Mac Pro?
 
Back
Top