Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

A whole new camera?

Evin Grant

Moderator
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
SoCal
Website
www.evingrantdp.com
I have owned my Red one since Dec. 31st 2007. I have shot and been a part of many high end productions that have been "shot on Red" so very little about the workflow surprises me anymore. I would also consider myself pretty liberal with exposure, routinely shooting at 400 (base) ISO, especially with 5600K lighting, which I have become accustomed too. So I hope you won't think me too "fanboy" or just plain barking mad when I say that I may have just discovered a whole new camera in my camera. In fact a whole new camera that I've had for a year and a half and all the footage I've ever shot with it is also new. OK, here's the rub (there always is one)...

...The new camera comes in two parts.
The first is the new Red Color science and is free but not released except to us test pilots, although that will change soon.
The second costs $100, and you'll need to put in some serious render time.

OK now you have the set up, here's the payoff...
I shot a little project for a director friend of mine a few weeks ago. It's supposed to be a night exterior, warm/cool deal and I had the entire lighting set-up worked out using those blue screen Kino bulbs, which were ordered but somehow got left out of the case and nobody bothered to check the order on pickup. Long story short to get the look the director wanted I had to blue gel the fuck out of a 4x4 Kino and push it through a soft frost leaving me with an exposure of T2 at about 1000 ISO 360º shutter. The noise didn't bother the director that much so we rolled with it. I figured we would have to run it through some heavy iron just to get it to look watchable, but it was what it was.

So tonight, feeling adventurous I ran the footage through the new color science in RA 3.72B and was very encouraged. The overall noise was at about a 1/2 stop better, but the most important difference was the reduction of the splotchyness in the blue channel. Again I wouldn't have characterized this as night and day at this exposure when played side by side but it was a significant improvement. Then a light bulb went off in my head, the biggest obstacle I have always had with noise reduction software is that splotchy blue channel, which always needs to be blurred to hell to fix and ends up killing all the detail. Enter the NeatVideo Pro plug-in (available for FCP, AE and AP). This is the video version of the NeatImage still noise reduction filter and the new Pro version that just came out in April supports 16 bit and 2K+ resolutions.
Sufficed to say the proof is in the pudding...

This is a full res 2K file so be patient, it'll be worth it.
(410MB 20sec 2K 2:1 Apple PR422 file, Cntrl/left click to download)
http://www.evingrant/com/flicks/JW_Noise.mov

ERG01.jpg

ERG02.jpg


The real thorn here is render time, the NeatVideo plug-in is amazing, this puts the Red one squarely in 5DMII territory now, but to get there will cost you about 45min of rendering for every minute of footage:yikes: (Mac Pro 3.0Ghz 8core, 12GB ram). The new Nahlems will probably really help and it may be faster in AE but still. I won't be shooting everything two stops under from now on but I also won't be afraid of the dark either.
 
Thanks Evin, your posts are very informative. I have been thinking the same thing since I tested as well. I have heard many good things about NeatVideo and I can see it really works wonders.
 
Dude...that's phenomenal. Like you said, not something to plan for, but incredible the tools that RED and others have provided for us to fall back on when we need them. Thanks for being very thorough as well. Ain't it a pain when you know that one light you *really* need is just sitting there in the rental dock?
Peace,

-Harry
 
If you look in the shot on RED thread at the music video I posted, the neatvideo plugin saved this project from disaster. Also if you look at all the MCU shots of the singer, you might be surprised to find out that these shots were done during a massive down pour!

We could not ADD rain to the shots that did not have it, so we used the neatvideo to REMOVE rain.. And it worked about 90% of what we needed.

I will say, if you find yourself shooting in a situation where you think noise will be a factor, make sure you take a large black flag and shoot it with the flag covering at least 25% of your frame. The software will need to take a "noise profile" and needs a solid black area to do it. The profile is the noise pattern of the camera and does not change shot to shot. However, the chroma characteristics do, so get as many "profile shots" for noise as you can.

The link to the music video is: http://www.vimeo.com/5008519

Like so many of you the client wanted a "big look" with little money. Weather was NOT kind to us at all, and we were sorely lacking in light on the night we had to shoot the singer. Then the rain started and due to some crew mistakes, we lost two of our lights. So we pushed the hell out of our picture, and it was noisy as hell.

We could not go back to reshoot. This plugin saved our asses. We used it on all shots of the singer which had serious problems.


I came across the neat video plug in and tried it out. Since I work in Cineform 4:4:4 the rendering was not TOO bad, but Evin's right, it's slow. I will say also be sure to use ADVANCED mode and set your color space to RGB.. You get a lot more control that way.

As I got better with the plug in I also discovered it's a WONDERFUL softening filter. We had some bad makeup with an actress, and with a little work this plugin smoothed her out without costing me a lot of detail.

It rocks.

Jay
 
I've used noise reduction on every RED job I've ever done, since 2007.

NeatVideo is currently my favorite too.

EDIT: beware, though - it also removes compression artifacts from RED's competitors ;)

There is a reason Cameron, Fincher, etc all use the Lowry process now.

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #7
There is a reason Cameron, Fincher, etc all use the Lowry process now.

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com

Is this related to NeatVideo? I wondered how Benjamin Button Looked so clean when I know how gritty the Viper looks out of the camera.
 
Is this related to NeatVideo? I wondered how Benjamin Button Looked so clean when I know how gritty the Viper looks out of the camera.

The Lowry process is basically the same concept as NeatVideo except running on a crazy supercomputer.

It looks from frame to frame and tries do intentify what is noise and what is picture information.

The Lowry process does a certain amount of super-resolution I think - eg it combines information from multiple frames to build a higher resolution image than any one frame.

Originally developed to help with film scans - now used heavily on digital.

I agree that NeatVideo is pretty neat though! So far if used properly it beats all the others I've tried. You can get more complex and set it up to work in multiple passes but then you're trading off even more CPU time.

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com
 
Evin,

Thanks for the tip. I downloaded the demo version and tried it on an old clip that I had shot indoors that shows lots of noise due to the low light. Holy cow! What a dramatic difference. I've purchased the plugin to add to the mix. I like CYA software like this. Makes me look like I almost have a clue... Thanks again!

Mark
 
I think my question is why wouldn't you just use NeatVideo on a completed product?

My guess is that it probably doesn't do quite as good of a job, but I like grading with R3Ds, it allows other nice things to happen.
 
Thanks for the tip Evan. I had bookmarked Neat Video after reading another thread a while back but never did feel confident enough about it to purchase. Purchased just now. :)

Does anyone know if the AE or Premiere Neat Video Plug-in is faster than the FCP plug-in on same footage with same settings on same computer?

-michael zaletel
(shooter)
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #17
I think my question is why wouldn't you just use NeatVideo on a completed product?

I think that is what I'm saying. It would be the last step after color correction and output to Prores or DPX.
Some testing is probably in order though.
 
I think that is what I'm saying. It would be the last step after color correction and output to Prores or DPX.
Some testing is probably in order though.

I'm sitting here with a smile on my face nodding in agreement. The clip I tried the demo on is now being crunched by the purchased version in FCP and the clip being a tad over eight minutes long is supposed to take "about 3 hours" to render. I would only want to do this to clips that were desperate and have no hope, except for this type of salvage. The real solution is to not get myself in the situation again, if at all possible. "We'll fix it in post..." is not the solution for good shooting.
 
EDIT: beware, though - it also removes compression artifacts from RED's competitors ;)
[/url]

Indeed ... it does do a good job on 5Dii material also ;-) ... but does NOT fix the moire.

For what it's worth, I could not get good (and reliable) performamce on Mac FCP (flaky), Motion (never worked). On Mac AE it's been stable and batch rendering is a breeze.
Neat Video heritage is PC so on that platform its rock solid.
 
NeatVideo vs. Nuke Furnace

NeatVideo vs. Nuke Furnace

Did anyone ever compare the NeatVideo plugin with Furnace DeNoise and MotionSmooth plugin in Nuke?
Furnace DeNoise does motion estimation, i'm still training on finetuning the plugin parameters but results are very good.
Wonder if NeatVideo has some advantages over Furnace plugins ...
 
Back
Top