Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Red 18-85 vs. Optimo 30-80 who's the first?

Vladimir Eugene

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
1,083
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles, CA
I would like to see this comparison, I have an 18-85 in the San Jose, CA- If you have an Optimo 30-80 near by, I volunteer.

Or if someone else has taken the time, please share.

vladimir
 
i guess its red 18-85 vs optimo rouge because of the pricepoint both lenses have.
Sanjin's right.
Pricepoint is only an issue if you're thinking about buying a lens, or have both available for hire and rental cost is an issue. the Red and the 17-80 are of similar and very practical focal length ranges. The 17-80 is the most amazing and handiest zoom in the world IMHO.
 
If the price-point is only an issue there are other options available like a Canon still glass

for example CANON EF-S 17-85MM F/4-5.6 IS USM extraordinary light (weight 475 g or 16.7 oz) and in the most cases useful

but then you would need Birger, Alesniak EF mount or better option like a *** for RED1

Also you would have to deal with a very bad sun flare issue.

But it's always like you get what you paid for.

IMS_RED_CanonEFS_17-85_01.jpg

CANON EF-S 17-85MM F/4-5.6 IS USM on RED1.


CANON EF-S 17-85MM TEST FOOTAGE>>>
 
Back
Top